Psychological, Cognitive, and Physiological Impact of Hazards Casualties' Trainings on First Responders: the Example of a Chemical and Radiological Training. An Exploratory Study

Overview

Journal Front Psychol

Date 2024 Feb 14

PMID 38352026

Authors

Louise Giaume

Barbara Le Roy

Yann Daniel

Heloise Lauga Cami

Daniel Jost

Stephane Travers

Marion Trousselard

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: First responders are among the first to respond to hazards casualties. They might operate in volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous (VUCA) environments. While they have underlined the need to improve their knowledge and training to face these environments, there are few data regarding the stress induced by these trainings. Chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) hazards casualties' trainings seem to be a good model of "" stress. First responders must operate in a hostile and encountered environment with a CBRN protective equipment that places demand on their psychological, cognitive, and physiological capacities. Current research recognizes that the activity of the parasympathetic system (PSS) can be used as an objective marker of stress adaptation, measured as heart rate variability (HRV).

Objectives: To compare between baseline and simulation the evolution of the parasympathetic activity (primary outcome), anxiety, emotions, cognitive load, and body posture awareness (secondary outcomes).

Methods: A total of 28 first responders attended to three simulated scenarios requiring CBRN management of casualties. One day before simulation, we collected HRV data (baseline). The simulations' day (pre-, post-simulation) we collected anxiety score (STAI-Y B), emotions (SPANE), cognitive load (NASA TLX), body posture awareness (PAS) and HRV. The morning after we collected the PAS score (recovery). We compare data' evolution between different times of the simulation.

Results: (i) A high level of anxiety at baseline [ 51 (46; 56)] which decreased between pre- and post-simulation ( = 0.04; = 2.93); (ii) a post-simulation decrease in negative feelings ( = 0.03); (iii) a decrease in body awareness after simulation which returned to the initial level at recovery ( = 0.03; = 3.48); (iv) a decrease in mean RR between baseline, pre- and post-simulation ( = 0.009; = 5.11). There were no significant difference between times on others analysis of HRV.

Conclusion: Prior to simulation, participants experienced anticipatory anxiety. Simulations training practiced regularly could be one way to combat anticipatory anxiety.

References

Chen W, Schloesser D, Arensdorf A, Simmons J, Cui C, Valentino R . The Emerging Science of Interoception: Sensing, Integrating, Interpreting, and Regulating Signals within the Self. Trends Neurosci. 2020; 44(1):3-16. PMC: 7780231. DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2020.10.007. View

Phelps E, LeDoux J . Contributions of the amygdala to emotion processing: from animal models to human behavior. Neuron. 2005; 48(2):175-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.09.025. View

Da Costa Silva L, Belrose C, Trousselard M, Rea B, Seery E, Verdonk C . Self-Reported Body Awareness: Validation of the Postural Awareness Scale and the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (Version 2) in a Non-clinical Adult French-Speaking Sample. Front Psychol. 2022; 13:946271. PMC: 9362853. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.946271. View

Pinna T, Edwards D . A Systematic Review of Associations Between Interoception, Vagal Tone, and Emotional Regulation: Potential Applications for Mental Health, Wellbeing, Psychological Flexibility, and Chronic Conditions. Front Psychol. 2020; 11:1792. PMC: 7419655. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01792. View

Zuo Y, Hua W, Luo Y, Li L . Skin reactions of N95 masks and medial masks among health-care personnel: A self-report questionnaire survey in China. Contact Dermatitis. 2020; 83(2):145-147. PMC: 7262031. DOI: 10.1111/cod.13555. View

Shaffer F, Ginsberg J . An Overview of Heart Rate Variability Metrics and Norms. Front Public Health. 2017; 5:258. PMC: 5624990. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00258. View

Tabah A, Ramanan M, Laupland K, Buetti N, Cortegiani A, Mellinghoff J . Personal protective equipment and intensive care unit healthcare worker safety in the COVID-19 era (PPE-SAFE): An international survey. J Crit Care. 2020; 59:70-75. PMC: 7293450. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.06.005. View

Lund-Kordahl I, Mathiassen M, Melau J, Olasveengen T, Sunde K, Fredriksen K . Relationship between level of CPR training, self-reported skills, and actual manikin test performance-an observational study. Int J Emerg Med. 2019; 12(1):2. PMC: 6327595. DOI: 10.1186/s12245-018-0220-9. View

Swaminathan R, Mukundadura B, Prasad S . Impact of enhanced personal protective equipment on the physical and mental well-being of healthcare workers during COVID-19. Postgrad Med J. 2020; 98(1157):231-233. DOI: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-139150. View

10.

Billman G . Homeostasis: The Underappreciated and Far Too Often Ignored Central Organizing Principle of Physiology. Front Physiol. 2020; 11:200. PMC: 7076167. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00200. View

11.

Palese A, Cadorin L, Testa M, Geri T, Colloca L, Rossettini G . Contextual factors triggering placebo and nocebo effects in nursing practice: Findings from a national cross-sectional study. J Clin Nurs. 2019; 28(9-10):1966-1978. DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14809. View

12.

Laborde S, Mosley E, Thayer J . Heart Rate Variability and Cardiac Vagal Tone in Psychophysiological Research - Recommendations for Experiment Planning, Data Analysis, and Data Reporting. Front Psychol. 2017; 8:213. PMC: 5316555. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00213. View

13.

Merchan A, Clemente-Suarez V . Psychophysiological modifications in an assault infantry manoeuvre using a chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear personal protective equipment. BMJ Mil Health. 2019; 166(2):62-66. DOI: 10.1136/jramc-2019-001166. View

14.

Kako M, Hammad K, Mitani S, Arbon P . Existing Approaches to Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) Education and Training for Health Professionals: Findings from an Integrative Literature Review. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018; 33(2):182-190. DOI: 10.1017/S1049023X18000043. View

15.

Gomez-Oliva E, Robles-Perez J, Ruiz-Barquin R, Hidalgo-Bellota F, de la Vega R . Psychophysiological response to the use of nuclear, biological and chemical equipment with military tasks. Physiol Behav. 2019; 204:186-190. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.02.019. View

16.

Delgado-Moreno R, Robles-Perez J, Aznar-Lain S, Clemente-Suarez V . Effect of Experience and Psychophysiological Modification by Combat Stress in Soldier's Memory. J Med Syst. 2019; 43(6):150. DOI: 10.1007/s10916-019-1261-1. View

17.

Ramesh A, Kumar S . Triage, monitoring, and treatment of mass casualty events involving chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear agents. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2011; 2(3):239-47. PMC: 3148628. DOI: 10.4103/0975-7406.68506. View

18.

Suzuki K, Garfinkel S, Critchley H, Seth A . Multisensory integration across exteroceptive and interoceptive domains modulates self-experience in the rubber-hand illusion. Neuropsychologia. 2013; 51(13):2909-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.08.014. View

19.

Selye H . Stress and the general adaptation syndrome. Br Med J. 1950; 1(4667):1383-92. PMC: 2038162. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.1.4667.1383. View

20.

Tin D, Ciottone G . Chemical Agent Use in Terrorist Events: A Gathering Storm Requiring Enhanced Civilian Preparedness. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2022; 37(3):327-332. DOI: 10.1017/S1049023X22000528. View