» Articles » PMID: 38351990

Surgically Implanted Endovascular, Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device: A Single Institution Study

Overview
Journal JTCVS Tech
Date 2024 Feb 14
PMID 38351990
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The Impella 5.5 (Abiomed, Inc), a surgically implanted endovascular microaxial left ventricular assist device, is increasingly used worldwide and there have been more than 10,000 implants. The purpose of this study is to describe a large-volume, single-center experience with the use of the Impella 5.5.

Methods: Data were obtained retrospectively from patients supported with the Impella 5.5 implanted at our institution from May 1, 2020, to December 31, 2022. Demographic, operative, and postoperative outcomes for each group are described. Results are reported in median (interquartile range) or n (%). The entire cohort was divided into 5 main groups based on the intention to treat at the time of the Impella 5.5 implantation: (1) patients who had a planned Impella 5.5 implanted at the time of high-risk cardiac surgery; (2) patients with cardiogenic shock; (3) patients bridged to a durable left ventricular assist device; (4) patients bridged to transplant; and (5) patients with postcardiotomy shock who received an unplanned Impella 5.5 implant.

Results: A total of 126 patients were supported with the Impella 5.5. Overall survival to device explant was 76.2%, with 67.5% surviving to discharge. Midterm survival was assessed with a median follow-up time of 318 days and demonstrated an overall survival of 60.3% and a median of 650 days (549-752).

Conclusions: Outcomes after using the Impella 5.5 are variable depending on the indication of use. Patient selection may be of utmost importance and requires further experience with this device to determine who will benefit from insertion.

Citing Articles

Use of Intravascular Micro-Axial Left Ventricular Assist Devices as a Bridging Strategy for Cardiogenic Shock: Mid-Term Outcomes.

Mahesh B, Peddaayyavarla P, Nguyen K, Mahesh A, Hartford C, Devich R J Clin Med. 2024; 13(22).

PMID: 39597948 PMC: 11595086. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13226804.


Are there etiology-specific risk factors for adverse outcomes in patients on Impella 5.5 support?.

Maigrot J, Thuita L, Tong M, Soltesz E, Smedira N, Unai S JTCVS Open. 2024; 21:123-137.

PMID: 39534347 PMC: 11551278. DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2024.04.014.


Trajectories following Impella 5.5 support are associated with initial presentation acuity.

Maigrot J, Starling R, Soltesz E, Smedira N, Tong M, Unai S Artif Organs. 2024; 49(1):137-145.

PMID: 39422190 PMC: 11687209. DOI: 10.1111/aor.14867.

References
1.
Cohen W, Rekhtman D, Iyengar A, Shin M, Ibrahim M, Bermudez C . Extended Support With the Impella 5.5: Transplant, ECMO, and Complications. ASAIO J. 2023; 69(7):642-648. DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001931. View

2.
Rock J, Kos C, Lemaire A, Ikegami H, Russo M, Moin D . Single center first year experience and outcomes with Impella 5.5 left ventricular assist device. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022; 17(1):124. PMC: 9128113. DOI: 10.1186/s13019-022-01871-1. View

3.
Succar L, Donahue K, Varnado S, Kim J . Use of Tissue Plasminogen Activator Alteplase for Suspected Impella Thrombosis. Pharmacotherapy. 2019; 40(2):169-173. DOI: 10.1002/phar.2356. View

4.
Bertoldi L, Pappalardo F, Lubos E, Grahn H, Rybczinski M, Barten M . Bridging INTERMACS 1 patients from VA-ECMO to LVAD via Impella 5.0: De-escalate and ambulate. J Crit Care. 2020; 57:259-263. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.12.028. View

5.
Ruhparwar A, Zubarevich A, Osswald A, Raake P, Kreusser M, Grossekettler L . ECPELLA 2.0-Minimally invasive biventricular groin-free full mechanical circulatory support with Impella 5.0/5.5 pump and ProtekDuo cannula as a bridge-to-bridge concept: A first-in-man method description. J Card Surg. 2019; 35(1):195-199. DOI: 10.1111/jocs.14283. View