» Articles » PMID: 38349922

Effect of Motivated Physicians and Elderly Patients with Hypertension or Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Prepared Communities on Health Behaviours and Outcomes: A Population-based PS Matched Retrospective Cohort Study During Five-year Follow-up Period

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2024 Feb 13
PMID 38349922
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Effective chronic disease management requires the active participation of patients, communities, and physicians. The objective of this study was to estimate the effectiveness of the Community-based Registration and Management for elderly patients with Hypertension or Type 2 Diabetes mellitus Project (CRMHDP) by using motivated primary care physicians and patients supported by prepared communities, to utilise healthcare and health outcomes in four cities in South Korea. We conducted a propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study using 2010-2011 as the baseline years, alongside a follow-up period until 2015/2016, based on the Korean National Health Insurance database. Both a CRMHDP group (n = 46,865) and a control group (n = 93,730) were applied against healthcare utilisation and difference-in-differences estimations were performed. For the health outcome analysis, the intervention group (n = 27,242) and control group (n = 54,484) were analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard regression. Results: The difference-in-differences estimation of the average annual clinic visits per person and the average annual days covered were 1.26 (95% confidence interval, 1.13-1.39) and 22.97 (95% CI, 20.91-25.03), respectively, between the intervention and control groups. The adjusted hazard ratio for death in the intervention group, compared to the control group, was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.86-0.93). For stroke and chronic renal failure, the adjusted hazard ratios for the intervention group compared to the control group were 0.94 (95% CI, 0.88-0.99) and 0.80 (95% CI 0.73-0.89), respectively. Our study suggests that for effective chronic disease management both elderly patients and physicians need to be motivated by community support.

References
1.
Profili F, Bellini I, Zuppiroli A, Seghieri G, Barbone F, Francesconi P . Changes in diabetes care introduced by a Chronic Care Model-based programme in Tuscany: a 4-year cohort study. Eur J Public Health. 2017; 27(1):14-19. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw181. View

2.
Ballo P, Profili F, Policardo L, Roti L, Francesconi P, Zuppiroli A . Opposite trends in hospitalization and mortality after implementation of a chronic care model-based regional program for the management of patients with heart failure in primary care. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018; 18(1):388. PMC: 5975582. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3164-0. View

3.
Dimick J, Birkmeyer N . Rethinking eligibility criteria for bariatric surgery. JAMA. 2014; 312(9):953-4. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.3836. View

4.
Kang J, Park J, Cho J . Inclusive Aging in Korea: Eradicating Senior Poverty. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(4). PMC: 8871725. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19042121. View

5.
Vervloet M, Linn A, van Weert J, de Bakker D, Bouvy M, van Dijk L . The effectiveness of interventions using electronic reminders to improve adherence to chronic medication: a systematic review of the literature. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012; 19(5):696-704. PMC: 3422829. DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000748. View