A Study on Effects of Cell Phone Tower-emitted Non-ionizing Radiations in an Allium Cepa Test System

Overview

Journal Environ Monit Assess

Publisher Springer

Specialty Environmental Health

Date 2024 Feb 13

PMID 38349609

Authors

Ankita Sharma

Surbhi Sharma

Shalini Bahel

Jatinder Kaur Katnoria

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Considering enormous growth in population, technical advancement, and added reliance on electronic devices leading to adverse health effects, in situ simulations were made to evaluate effects of non-ionizing radiations emitted from three cell phone towers (T1, T2, and T3) of frequency bands (800, 1800, 2300 MHz), (900, 1800, 2300 MHz), and (1800 MHz), respectively. Five sites (S1-S5) were selected near cell phone towers exhibiting different power densities. The site with zero power density was considered as control. Effects of radiations were studied on morphology; protein content; antioxidant enzymes like ascorbate peroxidase (APX), superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione-S-transferase (GST), guaiacol peroxidase (POD), and glutathione reductase (GR); and genotoxicity using Allium cepa. Mean power density (μW/cm) was recorded as 1.05, 1.18, 1.6, 2.73, and 12.9 for sites 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. A significant change in morphology, root length, fresh weight, and dry weight in Allium cepa was observed under the exposure at different sites. Protein content of roots showed significant difference for samples at all sites while bulbs at sites S4 and S5 when compared to control. Antioxidant activity for root in terms of APX, GST, and POD showed significant changes at S4 and S5 and GR at site S5 and SOD at S1, S2, S3, S4, and S5. Similarly, bulbs showed significant changes at sites S4 and S5 for APX while at sites S3, S4, and S5 for POD and S2, S3, S4, and S5 for SOD and S5 for GR and GST. Genotoxicity study has shown induction of abnormalities at different stages of the cell cycle in Allium cepa root tips. The samples under exposure to radiation with maximum power density have shown maximum induction of oxidative stress and genotoxicity.

References

Carlberg I, Mannervik B . Purification and characterization of the flavoenzyme glutathione reductase from rat liver. J Biol Chem. 1975; 250(14):5475-80. View

Chandel S, Kaur S, Singh H, Batish D, Kohli R . Exposure to 2100 MHz electromagnetic field radiations induces reactive oxygen species generation in roots. J Microsc Ultrastruct. 2018; 5(4):225-229. PMC: 6025783. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmau.2017.09.001. View

Chandel S, Kaur S, Issa M, Singh H, Batish D, Kohli R . Exposure to mobile phone radiations at 2350 MHz incites cyto- and genotoxic effects in root meristems of . J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2019; 17(1):97-104. PMC: 6582205. DOI: 10.1007/s40201-018-00330-1. View

Corson L, Folmer J, Strain J, Culotta V, Cleveland D . Oxidative stress and iron are implicated in fragmenting vacuoles of Saccharomyces cerevisiae lacking Cu,Zn-superoxide dismutase. J Biol Chem. 1999; 274(39):27590-6. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.274.39.27590. View

Dasdag S, Akdag M . The link between radiofrequencies emitted from wireless technologies and oxidative stress. J Chem Neuroanat. 2015; 75(Pt B):85-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2015.09.001. View

Gill S, Tuteja N . Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2010; 48(12):909-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.08.016. View

Grant W . Higher plant assays for the detection of chromosomal aberrations and gene mutations-a brief historical background on their use for screening and monitoring environmental chemicals. Mutat Res. 1999; 426(2):107-12. DOI: 10.1016/s0027-5107(99)00050-0. View

Habig W, Jakoby W . Assays for differentiation of glutathione S-transferases. Methods Enzymol. 1981; 77:398-405. DOI: 10.1016/s0076-6879(81)77053-8. View

Kono Y . Generation of superoxide radical during autoxidation of hydroxylamine and an assay for superoxide dismutase. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1978; 186(1):189-95. DOI: 10.1016/0003-9861(78)90479-4. View

10.

Kumar A, Kaur S, Chandel S, Singh H, Batish D, Kohli R . Comparative cyto- and genotoxicity of 900 MHz and 1800 MHz electromagnetic field radiations in root meristems of Allium cepa. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2019; 188:109786. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.109786. View

11.

LOWRY O, ROSEBROUGH N, FARR A, RANDALL R . Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951; 193(1):265-75. View

12.

Marjanovic A, Pavicic I, Trosic I . Biological indicators in response to radiofrequency/microwave exposure. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol. 2012; 63(3):407-16. DOI: 10.2478/10004-1254-63-2012-2215. View

13.

Qureshi S, Memon S, Abassi A, Sial M, Bughio F . Radiofrequency radiations induced genotoxic and carcinogenic effects on chickpea ( L.) root tip cells. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2017; 24(4):883-891. PMC: 5415122. DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2016.02.011. View

14.

Sharma V, Singh H, Kohli R, Batish D . Mobile phone radiation inhibits Vigna radiata (mung bean) root growth by inducing oxidative stress. Sci Total Environ. 2009; 407(21):5543-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.07.006. View

15.

Sharma S, Bahel S, Katnoria J . Evaluation of oxidative stress and genotoxicity of 900 MHz electromagnetic radiations using Trigonella foenum-graecum test system. Protoplasma. 2022; 260(1):209-224. DOI: 10.1007/s00709-022-01768-9. View

16.

Singh H, Sharma V, Batish D, Kohli R . Cell phone electromagnetic field radiations affect rhizogenesis through impairment of biochemical processes. Environ Monit Assess. 2011; 184(4):1813-21. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-011-2080-0. View