» Articles » PMID: 38348807

Association of Socioeconomic Status With Life's Essential 8 in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: Effect Modification by Sex

Abstract

Background: Higher scores for the American Heart Association Life's Essential 8 (LE8) metrics, blood pressure, cholesterol, glucose, body mass index, physical activity, smoking, sleep, and diet, are associated with lower risk of chronic disease. Socioeconomic status (SES; employment, insurance, education, and income) is associated with LE8 scores, but there is limited understanding of potential differences by sex. This analysis quantifies the association of SES with LE8 for each sex, within Hispanic Americans, non-Hispanic Asian Americans, non-Hispanic Black Americans, and non-Hispanic White Americans.

Methods And Results: Using cross-sectional data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, years 2011 to 2018, LE8 scores were calculated (range, 0-100). Age-adjusted linear regression quantified the association of SES with LE8 score. The interaction of sex with SES in the association with LE8 score was assessed in each racial and ethnic group. The US population representatively weighted sample (13 529 observations) was aged ≥20 years (median, 48 years). The association of education and income with LE8 scores was higher in women compared with men for non-Hispanic Black Americans and non-Hispanic White Americans ( for all interactions <0.05). Among non-Hispanic Asian Americans and Hispanic Americans, the association of SES with LE8 was not different between men and women, and women had greater LE8 scores than men at all SES levels (eg, high school or less, some college, and college degree or more).

Conclusions: The factors that explain the sex differences among non-Hispanic Black Americans and non-Hispanic White Americans, but not non-Hispanic Asian Americans and Hispanic Americans, are critical areas for further research to advance cardiovascular health equity.

Citing Articles

Association Between Heavy Metals Mixtures and Life's Essential 8 Score in General US Adults.

Kong X, Li C, Pan Y Cardiovasc Toxicol. 2025; 25(4):592-603.

PMID: 39920440 DOI: 10.1007/s12012-025-09969-3.


American society for preventive cardiology 2024 cardiovascular disease prevention: Highlights and key sessions.

Chandra A, Espiche C, Maliha M, Virani S, Blumenthal R, Rodriguez F Am J Prev Cardiol. 2025; 21:100919.

PMID: 39802677 PMC: 11722599. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2024.100919.


Association of life's essential 8 with all-cause and cause-specific mortality in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.

Li X, Zhang Y, Gong J, Ni X, Yin J, Lv Z Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):30624.

PMID: 39715781 PMC: 11666574. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-82875-w.


Biopsychosocial factors associated with physical activity among Resettlers of the former Soviet Union in Germany: a cross-sectional analysis.

Ouma M, Juma K, Meisinger C, Stolpe S, Becher H, Winkler V BMJ Open. 2024; 14(12):e086042.

PMID: 39653577 PMC: 11628956. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086042.


Adherence to higher Life's Essential 8 scores is linearly associated with reduced all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among US adults with metabolic syndrome: Results from NHANES 2005-2018.

Zhou D, Liang J, Hu X, Fang H, Liu D, Zhao H PLoS One. 2024; 19(11):e0314152.

PMID: 39576789 PMC: 11584117. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314152.


References
1.
Andersson M, Harnois C . Higher exposure, lower vulnerability? The curious case of education, gender discrimination, and Women's health. Soc Sci Med. 2020; 246:112780. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112780. View

2.
Pascoe E, Richman L . Perceived discrimination and health: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull. 2009; 135(4):531-54. PMC: 2747726. DOI: 10.1037/a0016059. View

3.
Lloyd-Jones D, Ning H, Labarthe D, Brewer L, Sharma G, Rosamond W . Status of Cardiovascular Health in US Adults and Children Using the American Heart Association's New "Life's Essential 8" Metrics: Prevalence Estimates From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 2013 Through 2018. Circulation. 2022; 146(11):822-835. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.060911. View

4.
Xu K, Borders T . Gender, health, and physician visits among adults in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2003; 93(7):1076-9. PMC: 1447909. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.93.7.1076. View

5.
Adelman R, Tmanova L, Delgado D, Dion S, Lachs M . Caregiver burden: a clinical review. JAMA. 2014; 311(10):1052-60. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.304. View