» Articles » PMID: 38347474

The Cost of Saying No: General Practitioners' Gatekeeping Role in Sickness Absence Certification

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2024 Feb 12
PMID 38347474
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: General practitioners (GPs) have an important gatekeeping role in the Norwegian sickness insurance system. This role includes limiting access to paid sick leave when this is not justified according to sick leave criteria. 85% of GPs in Norway operate within a fee-for-service system that incentivises short consultations and high service provision. In this qualitative study, we explore how GPs practise the gatekeeping role in sickness absence certification.

Methods: Qualitative data was collected through six focus group interviews with 33 GPs, working in practices with a minimum of four practising GPs, in different geographical regions across Norway, including both urban and rural areas. Data was analysed using Braune and Clarke's thematic analysis approach.

Results: Our results indicate that GPs' sick-listing decisions are largely driven by patient demand and preferences for sick leave. GPs reported that they rarely overrule patient requests for sickness absence, including in cases where such requests conflict with the GPs' opinion of whether sick leave is justified or benefits the patient. The degree of effort made to limit unjustified or non-beneficial sick leave seems to depend on the GPs' available time and perceived risk of conflict with the patient. GPs generally expressed dissatisfaction with their role as certifiers of sickness absence.

Conclusion: Our study suggests that GPs' decisions about sickness certification is largely driven by patient preferences. The GPs' gatekeeping function is limited to negotiations about grade and duration of absence spells.

Citing Articles

Time is money: general practitioners' reflections on the fee-for-service system.

Kraft K, Hoff E, Nylenna M, Moe C, Mykletun A, Ostby K BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):472.

PMID: 38622602 PMC: 11020312. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10968-3.

References
1.
Quinn A, Trachtenberg A, McBrien K, Ogundeji Y, Souri S, Manns L . Impact of payment model on the behaviour of specialist physicians: A systematic review. Health Policy. 2020; 124(4):345-358. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.02.007. View

2.
Aakvik A, Holmas T, Islam M . Does variation in general practitioner (GP) practice matter for the length of sick leave? A multilevel analysis based on Norwegian GP-patient data. Soc Sci Med. 2010; 70(10):1590-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.031. View

3.
Carlsen B, Norheim O . "Saying no is no easy matter" a qualitative study of competing concerns in rationing decisions in general practice. BMC Health Serv Res. 2005; 5:70. PMC: 1291367. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-5-70. View

4.
Carlsen B, Lind J, Nyborg K . Why physicians are lousy gatekeepers: Sicklisting decisions when patients have private information on symptoms. Health Econ. 2020; 29(7):778-789. DOI: 10.1002/hec.4019. View

5.
Willems D . Balancing rationalities: gatekeeping in health care. J Med Ethics. 2001; 27(1):25-9. PMC: 1733346. DOI: 10.1136/jme.27.1.25. View