» Articles » PMID: 38347364

Dynamic Impact of Demographic Features, FDI, and Technological Innovations on Ecological Footprint: Evidence from European Emerging Economies

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2024 Feb 12
PMID 38347364
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Climate change effect mitigation is a critical priority for top leaders and communities around the globe. Human-induced environmental issues are affecting humankind's standard of living and development potential and the planetary boundaries. Sustainability objectives aim to enhance environmental quality and ensure sustainable development for all by eliminating social inequalities. This study examines the complex relationships between demographic features, foreign direct investment, technological innovation, and ecological footprint, emphasizing the relevance of population aging, population density, and urbanization in this context. The research uses a selection of emerging European economies during 1995-2018. The reasons for countries' selection are related to the increasing rate of population aging in European countries, the attractiveness for foreign direct investment, the economic growth, and the technological advancement potential these emerging countries possess. In order to investigate the long-run relationship between the selected variables, the study tests the cross-section dependence, homogeneity, and cointegration and uses Konya tests to determine panel causality. Based on Konya methodology, differences between countries in the panel are evidenced and discussed accordingly. Our findings confirm the long-run relationship between environment, technological innovation, population aging, and FDI. The results of this research are highly relevant for policymakers in selected countries for identifying the set of correlations and the relevance of various variables in such national economies. Demographic features such as population aging and population density are critical for Europe, and the results show the impact on the ecological footprint.

References
1.
Adams S, Boateng E, Acheampong A . Transport energy consumption and environmental quality: Does urbanization matter?. Sci Total Environ. 2020; 744:140617. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140617. View

2.
Apostu S, Gigauri I, Panait M, Martin-Cervantes P . Is Europe on the Way to Sustainable Development? Compatibility of Green Environment, Economic Growth, and Circular Economy Issues. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(2). PMC: 9859617. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20021078. View

3.
Chien F, Hsu C, Andlib Z, Shah M, Ajaz T, Genie M . The role of solar energy and eco-innovation in reducing environmental degradation in China: Evidence from QARDL approach. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2021; 18(2):555-571. DOI: 10.1002/ieam.4500. View

4.
Dimnwobi S, Ekesiobi C, Madichie C, Asongu S . Population dynamics and environmental quality in Africa. Sci Total Environ. 2021; 797:149172. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149172. View

5.
Esmaeili P, Lorente D, Anwar A . Revisiting the environmental Kuznetz curve and pollution haven hypothesis in N-11 economies: Fresh evidence from panel quantile regression. Environ Res. 2023; 228:115844. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.115844. View