» Articles » PMID: 38343906

Examining Differences in Time to Appointment and No-show Rates Between Rural Telehealth Users and Non-users

Overview
Date 2024 Feb 12
PMID 38343906
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Telehealth has undergone widespread implementation since 2020 and is considered an invaluable tool to improve access to healthcare, particularly in rural areas. However, telehealth's applicability may be limited for certain populations including those who live in rural, medically underserved communities. While broadband access is a recognized barrier, other important factors including age and education influence a person's ability or preference to engage with telehealth via video telehealth or a patient portal. It remains unclear the degree to which these digital technologies lead to disparities in access to care.

Purpose: The purpose of this analysis is to determine if access to healthcare differs for telehealth users compared with non-users.

Methods: Using electronic health record data, we evaluated differences in "time to appointment" and "no-show rates" between telehealth users and non-users within an integrated healthcare network between August 2021 and January 2022. We limited analysis to patient visits in endocrinology or outpatient behavioral health departments. We analyzed new patients and established patients separately.

Results: Telehealth visits were associated with shorter time to appointment for new and established patients in endocrinology and established patients in behavioral health, as well as with lower no-show rates for established patients in both departments.

Conclusions: The findings suggest that those who are unwilling or unable to engage with telehealth may have more difficulty accessing timely care.

References
1.
Connolly S, Miller C, Gifford A, Charness M . Perceptions and Use of Telehealth Among Mental Health, Primary, and Specialty Care Clinicians During the COVID-19 Pandemic. JAMA Netw Open. 2022; 5(6):e2216401. PMC: 9175071. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.16401. View

2.
Sachs J, Graven P, Gold J, Kassakian S . Disparities in telephone and video telehealth engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMIA Open. 2021; 4(3):ooab056. PMC: 8496485. DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooab056. View

3.
Graetz I, Huang J, Muelly E, Gopalan A, Lee C, Reed M . Patient choice of telemedicine increases timeliness of primary care visits. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2021; 2020:502-503. PMC: 8075419. View

4.
Warr D, Luscombe G, Couch D . Hype, evidence gaps and digital divides: Telehealth blind spots in rural Australia. Health (London). 2021; 27(4):588-606. DOI: 10.1177/13634593211060763. View

5.
Graetz I, Huang J, Muelly E, Gopalan A, Reed M . Primary Care Visits Are Timelier When Patients Choose Telemedicine: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study. Telemed J E Health. 2022; 28(9):1374-1378. PMC: 9634963. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2021.0528. View