» Articles » PMID: 38342841

Predicting and Analysing of the Unfavourable Outcomes of Early Applicated Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: Development and Validation Based Nomogram

Overview
Journal Eur Spine J
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2024 Feb 11
PMID 38342841
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To predict and analyse the unfavourable outcomes of early applicated percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy for lumbar disc herniation.

Methods: Information of 426 patients treated by early applicated percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID) for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) at our hospital from June 2017 to October 2021 in addition to 17 other features was collected. The risk factors were selected by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method (LASSO) regression. Then, a prediction model (nomogram) was established to predict the unfavourable outcomes of using the risk factors selected from LASSO regression. Bootstrap (n = 1000) was used to perform the internal validation, and the performance of the model was assessed by the concordance index (C-index), receiver operating characteristic curve, and calibration curve. The decision curve analysis (DCA) and clinical impact curve (CIC) were used to assess the clinical utility of the model, respectively.

Results: Finally, 53 of 426 patients showed unfavourable outcomes. Five potential factors, Modic change, Calcification, Lumbar epidural steroid injection preoperative, Articular process hyperplasia and cohesion, and Laminoplasty technique, were selected according to the LASSO regression, that identified the predictors to establish nomogram model. Meanwhile, the C-index of the prediction nomogram was 0.847, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value was 0.847, and the interval bootstrapping (n = 1000) validation C-index was 0.809. The model has good practicability for clinics according to the DCA and CIC.

Conclusion: This nomogram model has good predictive performance and clinical practicability, which could provide a certain basis for predicting unfavourable outcomes of early applicated PEID for LDH.

Citing Articles

Development and validation of a nomogram to predict the unfavorable outcomes in elderly patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative disease.

Cui P, Wang S, Zhang H, Wang P, Chen X, Kong C BMC Surg. 2024; 24(1):401.

PMID: 39709375 PMC: 11662434. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-024-02720-9.

References
1.
Machino M, Ando K, Kobayashi K, Nakashima H, Kanbara S, Ito S . Influence of Global Spine Sagittal Balance and Spinal Degenerative Changes on Locomotive Syndrome Risk in a Middle-Age and Elderly Community-Living Population. Biomed Res Int. 2020; 2020:3274864. PMC: 7532429. DOI: 10.1155/2020/3274864. View

2.
Wu T, Yuan J, Jia J, He D, Miao X, Deng J . Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy via Laminoplasty Technique for L -S Lumbar Disc Herniation with a Narrow Interlaminar Window. Orthop Surg. 2021; 13(3):825-832. PMC: 8126925. DOI: 10.1111/os.12978. View

3.
Ma C, Li H, Zhang T, Wei Y, Zhang H, Yu F . Comparison of Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy and Open Fenestration Discectomy for Single-Segment Huge Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Two-year Follow-up Retrospective Study. J Pain Res. 2022; 15:1061-1070. PMC: 9013921. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S352595. View

4.
Kim H, Park J . Comparative assessment of different percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar lumbar discectomy (PEID) techniques. Pain Physician. 2013; 16(4):359-67. View

5.
Martin B, Mirza S, Flum D, Wickizer T, Heagerty P, Lenkoski A . Repeat surgery after lumbar decompression for herniated disc: the quality implications of hospital and surgeon variation. Spine J. 2011; 12(2):89-97. PMC: 3299929. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.11.010. View