» Articles » PMID: 38342800

Reasons Why It is Time to Change Imaging Guidelines on Endometriosis

Overview
Journal Eur Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2024 Feb 11
PMID 38342800
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In light of the rising number of patients referred for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) due to suspected endometriosis and the high expectations of these patients, there is a need for new imaging guidelines to optimally protocol and indicate MRI and transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS) examinations. This is crucial for accurately addressing the inquiries of gynecologists, encompassing complete mapping and preoperative staging, and facilitating effective communication with patients. In this context, the development of a standardized lexicon, as well as dedicated imaging classifications, is recommended to aid in the comprehensive management of patients. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The radiologist should use a standardized lexicon and provide a score along with details about the specific compartments affected by endometriosis disease. This helps in offering clearer guidance to the surgeon. KEY POINTS: • An optimal staging is based on the combination of clinical examination, transvaginal US, and MRI. • MRI is able to detect location that is hidden at the beginning of a laparoscopic surgery and thus the need for dedicated MR classifications to correctly stage the disease. • Deep pelvic endometriosis index (dPEI) classification is externally validated and highly correlated with operating time, hospital stay, and postoperative complications.

References
1.
Roman H, Chanavaz-Lacheray I, Hennetier C, Tuech J, Dennis T, Verspyck E . Long-term risk of repeated surgeries in women managed for endometriosis: a 1,092 patient-series. Fertil Steril. 2023; 120(4):870-879. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.05.156. View

2.
Nisenblat V, Bossuyt P, Farquhar C, Johnson N, Hull M . Imaging modalities for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 2:CD009591. PMC: 7100540. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009591.pub2. View

3.
Roditis A, Florin M, Rousset P, Touboul C, Bendifallah S, Bazot M . Accuracy of combined physical examination, transvaginal ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging to diagnose deep endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2022; 119(4):634-643. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.12.025. View

4.
Bazot M, Bharwani N, Huchon C, Kinkel K, Cunha T, Guerra A . European society of urogenital radiology (ESUR) guidelines: MR imaging of pelvic endometriosis. Eur Radiol. 2016; 27(7):2765-2775. PMC: 5486785. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-016-4673-z. View

5.
Sadowski E, Stein E, Thomassin-Naggara I, Rockall A, Nougaret S, Reinhold C . O-RADS MRI After Initial Ultrasound for Adnexal Lesions: Expert Panel Narrative Review. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022; 220(1):6-15. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.22.28084. View