Precise Control of Digital Dental Unit to Reduce Aerosol and Splatter Production: New Challenges for Future Epidemics

Overview

Journal BMC Oral Health

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Dentistry

Date 2024 Feb 10

PMID 38341576

Authors

Yuedi Yu

Xueling Wu

Yang Sun

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: During dental procedures, critical parameters, such as cooling condition, speed of the rotary dental turbine (handpiece), and distance and angle from pollution sources, were evaluated for transmission risk of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), simulated by spiking in a plasmid encoding a modified viral spike protein, HexaPro (S6P), in droplets and aerosols.

Methods: To simulate routine operation in dental clinics, dental procedures were conducted on a dental manikin within a digital dental unit, incorporating different dental handpiece speeds and cooling conditions. The tooth model was immersed in Coomassie brilliant blue dye and was pre-coated with 100 μL water spiked-in with S6P-encoding plasmid. Furthermore, the manikin was surrounded by filter papers and Petri dishes positioned at different distances and angles. Subsequently, the filter papers and Petri dishes were collected to evaluate the aerosol splash points and the viral load of S6P-encoding plasmid in aerosols and splatters generated during the dental procedure.

Results: Aerosol splashing generated a localized pollution area extended up to 60 cm, with heightened contamination risks concentrated within a 30 cm radius. Significant differences in aerosol splash points and viral load by different turbine handpiece speeds under any cooling condition (P < 0.05) were detected. The highest level of aerosol splash points and viral load were observed when the handpiece speed was set at 40,000 rpm. Conversely, the lowest level of aerosol splash point and viral load were found at a handpiece speed of 10,000 rpm. Moreover, the aerosol splash points with higher viral load were more prominent in the positions of the operator and assistant compared to other positions. Additionally, the position of the operator exhibited the highest viral load among all positions.

Conclusions: To minimize the spread of aerosol and virus in clinics, dentists are supposed to adopt the minimal viable speed of a dental handpiece with limited cooling water during dental procedures. In addition, comprehensive personal protective equipment is necessary for both dental providers and dental assistants.

References

Johnson A, Huang B, Galina I, Ngo A, Uppgaard R . Splatter generated by oral surgery irrigation and its implication for infection control. Clin Oral Investig. 2023; 27(11):6607-6612. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-05266-x. View

Dudding T, Sheikh S, Gregson F, Haworth J, Haworth S, Main B . A clinical observational analysis of aerosol emissions from dental procedures. PLoS One. 2022; 17(3):e0265076. PMC: 8912243. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265076. View

Ionescu A, Cagetti M, Ferracane J, Garcia-Godoy F, Brambilla E . Topographic aspects of airborne contamination caused by the use of dental handpieces in the operative environment. J Am Dent Assoc. 2020; 151(9):660-667. PMC: 7328555. DOI: 10.1016/j.adaj.2020.06.002. View

Takanabe Y, Maruoka Y, Kondo J, Yagi S, Chikazu D, Okamoto R . Dispersion of Aerosols Generated during Dental Therapy. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(21). PMC: 8583477. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182111279. View

Srinivasan M, Thyvalikakath T, Cook B, Zero D . COVID-19 and Saliva: A Primer for Dental Health Care Professionals. Int Dent J. 2021; 71(1):5-8. PMC: 7461162. DOI: 10.1111/idj.12606. View

Engsomboon N, Pachimsawat P, Thanathornwong B . Comparative Dissemination of Aerosol and Splatter Using Suction Device during Ultrasonic Scaling: A Pilot Study. Dent J (Basel). 2022; 10(8). PMC: 9406455. DOI: 10.3390/dj10080142. View

Hsieh C, Goldsmith J, Schaub J, DiVenere A, Kuo H, Javanmardi K . Structure-based design of prefusion-stabilized SARS-CoV-2 spikes. Science. 2020; 369(6510):1501-1505. PMC: 7402631. DOI: 10.1126/science.abd0826. View

Zhu M, Medina M, Nalliah R, Kadhium V, Bell E, Han T . Experimental evaluation of aerosol mitigation strategies in large open-plan dental clinics. J Am Dent Assoc. 2021; 153(3):208-220. DOI: 10.1016/j.adaj.2021.07.030. View

Veena H, Mahantesha S, Joseph P, Patil S, Patil S . Dissemination of aerosol and splatter during ultrasonic scaling: a pilot study. J Infect Public Health. 2015; 8(3):260-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2014.11.004. View

10.

Ahmed M, Jouhar R . Dissemination of Aerosol and Splatter in Clinical Environment during Cavity Preparation: An In Vitro Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(7). PMC: 8038515. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18073773. View

11.

Randall K, Ewing E, Marr L, Jimenez J, Bourouiba L . How did we get here: what are droplets and aerosols and how far do they go? A historical perspective on the transmission of respiratory infectious diseases. Interface Focus. 2021; 11(6):20210049. PMC: 8504878. DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2021.0049. View

12.

Al-Yaseen W, Jones R, McGregor S, Wade W, Gallagher J, Harris R . Aerosol and splatter generation with rotary handpieces used in restorative and orthodontic dentistry: a systematic review. BDJ Open. 2022; 8(1):26. PMC: 9447949. DOI: 10.1038/s41405-022-00118-4. View

13.

Mirbod P, Haffner E, Bagheri M, Higham J . Aerosol formation due to a dental procedure: insights leading to the transmission of diseases to the environment. J R Soc Interface. 2021; 18(176):20200967. PMC: 8086853. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2020.0967. View

14.

Holliday R, Allison J, Currie C, Edwards D, Bowes C, Pickering K . Evaluating contaminated dental aerosol and splatter in an open plan clinic environment: Implications for the COVID-19 pandemic. J Dent. 2020; 105:103565. PMC: 7787509. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103565. View

15.

Shahdad S, Patel T, Hindocha A, Cagney N, Mueller J, Seoudi N . The efficacy of an extraoral scavenging device on reduction of splatter contamination during dental aerosol generating procedures: an exploratory study. Br Dent J. 2020; . PMC: 7484927. DOI: 10.1038/s41415-020-2112-7. View

16.

Bennett A, Fulford M, Walker J, Bradshaw D, Martin M, Marsh P . Microbial aerosols in general dental practice. Br Dent J. 2001; 189(12):664-7. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4800859. View

17.

Fennelly M, Gallagher C, Harding M, Hellebust S, Wenger J, OSullivan N . Real-time Monitoring of Aerosol Generating Dental Procedures. J Dent. 2022; 120:104092. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104092. View

18.

Dehbandi R, Zazouli M . Stability of SARS-CoV-2 in different environmental conditions. Lancet Microbe. 2021; 1(4):e145. PMC: 7833680. DOI: 10.1016/S2666-5247(20)30093-8. View

19.

Melzow F, Mertens S, Todorov H, Groneberg D, Paris S, Gerber A . Aerosol exposure of staff during dental treatments: a model study. BMC Oral Health. 2022; 22(1):128. PMC: 9012061. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-022-02155-9. View

20.

Yang M, Chaghtai A, Melendez M, Hasson H, Whitaker E, Badi M . Mitigating saliva aerosol contamination in a dental school clinic. BMC Oral Health. 2021; 21(1):52. PMC: 7863034. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-021-01417-2. View