» Articles » PMID: 38339617

Preliminary Technical Validation of LittleBeats™: A Multimodal Sensing Platform to Capture Cardiac Physiology, Motion, and Vocalizations

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2024 Feb 10
PMID 38339617
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Across five studies, we present the preliminary technical validation of an infant-wearable platform, LittleBeats™, that integrates electrocardiogram (ECG), inertial measurement unit (IMU), and audio sensors. Each sensor modality is validated against data from gold-standard equipment using established algorithms and laboratory tasks. Interbeat interval (IBI) data obtained from the LittleBeats™ ECG sensor indicate acceptable mean absolute percent error rates for both adults (Study 1, = 16) and infants (Study 2, = 5) across low- and high-challenge sessions and expected patterns of change in respiratory sinus arrythmia (RSA). For automated activity recognition (upright vs. walk vs. glide vs. squat) using accelerometer data from the LittleBeats™ IMU (Study 3, = 12 adults), performance was good to excellent, with smartphone (industry standard) data outperforming LittleBeats™ by less than 4 percentage points. Speech emotion recognition (Study 4, = 8 adults) applied to LittleBeats™ versus smartphone audio data indicated a comparable performance, with no significant difference in error rates. On an automatic speech recognition task (Study 5, = 12 adults), the best performing algorithm yielded relatively low word error rates, although LittleBeats™ (4.16%) versus smartphone (2.73%) error rates were somewhat higher. Together, these validation studies indicate that LittleBeats™ sensors yield a data quality that is largely comparable to those obtained from gold-standard devices and established protocols used in prior research.

Citing Articles

Evaluating Users' Experiences of a Child Multimodal Wearable Device: Mixed Methods Approach.

McElwain N, Fisher M, Nebeker C, Bodway J, Islam B, Hasegawa-Johnson M JMIR Hum Factors. 2024; 11:e49316.

PMID: 38329785 PMC: 10884896. DOI: 10.2196/49316.

References
1.
de Barbaro K . Automated sensing of daily activity: A new lens into development. Dev Psychobiol. 2019; 61(3):444-464. PMC: 7343175. DOI: 10.1002/dev.21831. View

2.
Sawka M, Friedl K . Emerging Wearable Physiological Monitoring Technologies and Decision Aids for Health and Performance. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2017; 124(2):430-431. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00964.2017. View

3.
Wallen M, Gomersall S, Keating S, Wisloff U, Coombes J . Accuracy of Heart Rate Watches: Implications for Weight Management. PLoS One. 2016; 11(5):e0154420. PMC: 4883747. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154420. View

4.
Bagot K, Matthews S, Mason M, Squeglia L, Fowler J, Gray K . Current, future and potential use of mobile and wearable technologies and social media data in the ABCD study to increase understanding of contributors to child health. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2018; 32:121-129. PMC: 6447367. DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2018.03.008. View

5.
Nuske H, Goodwin M, Kushleyeva Y, Forsyth D, Pennington J, Masino A . Evaluating commercially available wireless cardiovascular monitors for measuring and transmitting real-time physiological responses in children with autism. Autism Res. 2021; 15(1):117-130. PMC: 9040058. DOI: 10.1002/aur.2633. View