» Articles » PMID: 38336943

Mobile App Activity Engagement by Cancer Patients and Their Caregivers Informs Remote Monitoring

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2024 Feb 9
PMID 38336943
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mobile phone applications ("apps") are potentially an effective, low-burden method to collect patient-reported outcomes outside the clinical setting. Using such apps consistently and in a timely way is critical for complete and accurate data capture, but no studies of concurrent reporting by cancer patient-caregiver dyads have been published in the peer-reviewed literature. This study assessed app engagement, defined as adherence, timing, and attrition with two smartphone applications, one for adult cancer patients and one for their informal caregivers. This was a single-arm, pilot study in which adult cancer patients undergoing IV chemotherapy or immunotherapy used the DigiBioMarC app, and their caregivers used the TOGETHERCare app, for approximately one month to report weekly on the patients' symptoms and wellbeing. Using app timestamp metadata, we assessed user adherence, overall and by participant characteristics. Fifty patient-caregiver dyads completed the study. Within the one-month study period, both adult cancer patients and their informal caregivers were highly adherent, with app activity completion at 86% for cancer patients and 84% for caregivers. Caregivers completed 86% of symptom reports, while cancer patients completed 89% of symptom reports. Cancer patients and their caregivers completed most activities within 48 h of availability on the app. These results suggest that the DigiBioMarC and TOGETHERCare apps can be used to collect patient- and caregiver-reported outcomes data during intensive treatment. From our research, we conclude that metadata from mobile apps can be used to inform clinical teams about study participants' engagement and wellbeing outside the clinical setting.

Citing Articles

Effect of Online Clinic on Follow-Up Compliance and Survival Outcomes in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Real-World Cohort Study from Endemic Area.

Chen S, Feng C, Sun P, Zhang J, Liang H Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(14).

PMID: 39057595 PMC: 11276505. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12141452.

References
1.
Oakley-Girvan I, Yunis R, Fonda S, Neeman E, Liu R, Aghaee S . A novel smartphone application for the informal caregivers of cancer patients: Usability study. PLOS Digit Health. 2023; 2(3):e0000173. PMC: 9983832. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000173. View

2.
Aapro M, Bossi P, Dasari A, Fallowfield L, Gascon P, Geller M . Digital health for optimal supportive care in oncology: benefits, limits, and future perspectives. Support Care Cancer. 2020; 28(10):4589-4612. PMC: 7447627. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05539-1. View

3.
Basch E, Schrag D, Henson S, Jansen J, Ginos B, Stover A . Effect of Electronic Symptom Monitoring on Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Patients With Metastatic Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2022; 327(24):2413-2422. PMC: 9168923. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2022.9265. View

4.
Barello S, Triberti S, Graffigna G, Libreri C, Serino S, Hibbard J . eHealth for Patient Engagement: A Systematic Review. Front Psychol. 2016; 6:2013. PMC: 4705444. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02013. View

5.
Pratap A, Chaibub Neto E, Snyder P, Stepnowsky C, Elhadad N, Grant D . Indicators of retention in remote digital health studies: a cross-study evaluation of 100,000 participants. NPJ Digit Med. 2020; 3:21. PMC: 7026051. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-020-0224-8. View