» Articles » PMID: 38333882

Clinical Setting Comparative Analysis of Uropathogens and Antibiotic Resistance: A Retrospective Study Spanning the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic

Overview
Date 2024 Feb 9
PMID 38333882
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in uropathogens has been increasing in Australia. Many nations observed heightened AMR during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, but it is not known how this may vary across clinical settings and in nations with lower infection rates.

Methods: We investigated the uropathogen composition and corresponding antibiotic resistance of 775 559 Australian isolates from the community, hospitals, and aged care facilities before (2016-2019) and during (2020-2022) the COVID-19 pandemic. A mathematical model was developed to predict the likelihood of resistance to currently recommended antibiotics for treating urinary tract infections (UTIs).

Results: Among uropathogens originating from the community, hospitals, and aged care facilities, accounted for 71.4%, 57.6%, and 65.2%, respectively. During the COVID-19 pandemic period, there was an increase in UTIs caused by across all settings. Uropathogens from aged care and hospitals frequently showed higher resistance to antibiotics compared to those isolated from the community. Interestingly, AMR among uropathogens showed a declining trend during the COVID-19 pandemic. Based on the resistance patterns of the past 3 years, our modeling predicted that 30%, 42.6%, and 38.8% of UTIs in the community, hospitals, and aged care facilities, respectively, would exhibit resistance to trimethoprim treatment as empirical therapy. In contrast, resistance to nitrofurantoin was predicted to be 14.6%, 26%, and 24.1% from these 3 respective settings.

Conclusions: Empirical therapy of UTIs in Australia with trimethoprim requires evaluation due to high rates of resistance observed across clinical settings.

Citing Articles

Shifting Trends of Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns Among Uropathogenic Bacteria Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

AlHemsi H, Altamimi I, Altamimi A, Alhemsi H, Alabdulkarim I, Zawawi A Cureus. 2024; 16(11):e73267.

PMID: 39650875 PMC: 11625378. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.73267.

References
1.
Lopez-Jacome L, Fernandez-Rodriguez D, Franco-Cendejas R, Camacho-Ortiz A, Morfin-Otero M, Rodriguez-Noriega E . Increment Antimicrobial Resistance During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results from the Invifar Network. Microb Drug Resist. 2021; 28(3):338-345. DOI: 10.1089/mdr.2021.0231. View

2.
Lemay-St-Denis C, Diwan S, Pelletier J . The Bacterial Genomic Context of Highly Trimethoprim-Resistant DfrB Dihydrofolate Reductases Highlights an Emerging Threat to Public Health. Antibiotics (Basel). 2021; 10(4). PMC: 8103504. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10040433. View

3.
Cuningham W, Perera S, Coulter S, Nimmo G, Yarwood T, Tong S . Antibiotic resistance in uropathogens across northern Australia 2007-20 and impact on treatment guidelines. JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2021; 3(3):dlab127. PMC: 8364662. DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlab127. View

4.
Fasugba O, Mitchell B, Mnatzaganian G, Das A, Collignon P, Gardner A . Five-Year Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns of Urinary Escherichia coli at an Australian Tertiary Hospital: Time Series Analyses of Prevalence Data. PLoS One. 2016; 11(10):e0164306. PMC: 5053592. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164306. View

5.
Langford B, Soucy J, Leung V, So M, Kwan A, Portnoff J . Antibiotic resistance associated with the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2022; 29(3):302-309. PMC: 9733301. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.12.006. View