» Articles » PMID: 38331766

A Cost-effectiveness Analysis of a Universal, Preventative-focused, Parent and Infant Programme

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2024 Feb 8
PMID 38331766
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: This study assessed whether a relatively newly developed Parent and Infant (PIN) parenting support programme was cost-effective when compared to services as usual (SAU).

Methods: The cost-effectiveness of the PIN programme versus SAU was assessed from an Irish health and social care perspective over a 24-month timeframe and within the context of a non-randomised, controlled before-and-after trial. In total, 163 parent-infant dyads were included in the study (86 intervention, 77 control). The primary outcome measure for the economic evaluation was the Parenting Sense of Competence Scale (PSOC).

Results: The average cost of the PIN programme was €647 per dyad. The mean (SE) cost (including programme costs) was €7,027 (SE €1,345) compared to €4,811 (SE €593) in the control arm, generating a (non-significant) mean cost difference of €2,216 (bootstrap 95% CI -€665 to €5,096; p = 0.14). The mean incremental cost-effectiveness of the PIN service was €614 per PSOC unit gained (bootstrap 95% CI €54 to €1,481). The probability that the PIN programme was cost-effective, was 87% at a willingness-to-pay of €1,000 per one unit change in the PSOC.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the PIN programme was cost-effective at a relatively low willingness-to-pay threshold when compared to SAU. This study addresses a significant knowledge gap in the field of early intervention by providing important real world evidence on the implementation costs and cost-effectiveness of a universal early years parenting programme. The challenges involved in assessing the cost-effectiveness of preventative interventions for very young children and their parents are also discussed.

Trial Registration: ISRCTN17488830 (Date of registration: 27/11/15). This trial was retrospectively registered.

References
1.
Begle A, Dumas J . Child and parental outcomes following involvement in a preventive intervention: efficacy of the PACE program. J Prim Prev. 2010; 32(2):67-81. PMC: 3071867. DOI: 10.1007/s10935-010-0232-6. View

2.
Wittkowski A, Garrett C, Calam R, Weisberg D . Self-Report Measures of Parental Self-Efficacy: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature. J Child Fam Stud. 2017; 26(11):2960-2978. PMC: 5646137. DOI: 10.1007/s10826-017-0830-5. View

3.
Pontoppidan M, Klest S, Patras J, Rayce S . Effects of universally offered parenting interventions for parents with infants: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2016; 6(9):e011706. PMC: 5051433. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011706. View

4.
Sampaio F, Nystrand C, Feldman I, Mihalopoulos C . Evidence for investing in parenting interventions aiming to improve child health: a systematic review of economic evaluations. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2022; 33(2):323-355. PMC: 10869412. DOI: 10.1007/s00787-022-01969-w. View

5.
Fang Y, van Grieken A, Fierloos I, Windhorst D, Jonkman H, Hosman C . Parental, child and socio-contextual factors associated with parenting self-efficacy among parents of children aged 0-7 years old: the CIKEO study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2021; 57(3):623-632. PMC: 8934325. DOI: 10.1007/s00127-021-02161-2. View