» Articles » PMID: 38331258

Spatial Nonstationarity of Image Noise in Widefield Optical Imaging and Its Effects on Cluster-based Inference for Resting-state Functional Connectivity

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2024 Feb 8
PMID 38331258
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) analysis with widefield optical imaging (WOI) is a potentially powerful tool to develop imaging biomarkers in mouse models of disease before translating them to human neuroimaging with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The delineation of such biomarkers depends on rigorous statistical analysis. However, statistical understanding of WOI data is limited. In particular, cluster-based analysis of neuroimaging data depends on assumptions of spatial stationarity (i.e., that the distribution of cluster sizes under the null is equal at all brain locations). Whether actual data deviate from this assumption has not previously been examined in WOI.

New Method: In this manuscript, we characterize the effects of spatial nonstationarity in WOI RSFC data and adapt a "two-pass" technique from fMRI to correct cluster sizes and mitigate spatial bias, both parametrically and nonparametrically. These methods are tested on multi-institutional data.

Results And Comparison With Existing Methods: We find that spatial nonstationarity has a substantial effect on inference in WOI RSFC data with false positives much more likely at some brain regions than others. This pattern of bias varies between imaging systems, contrasts, and mouse ages, all of which could affect experimental reproducibility if not accounted for.

Conclusions: Both parametric and nonparametric corrections for nonstationarity result in significant improvements in spatial bias. The proposed methods are simple to implement and will improve the robustness of inference in optical neuroimaging data.

References
1.
Tak S, Ye J . Statistical analysis of fNIRS data: a comprehensive review. Neuroimage. 2013; 85 Pt 1:72-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.016. View

2.
White B, Padawer-Curry J, Cohen A, Licht D, Yodh A . Brain segmentation, spatial censoring, and averaging techniques for optical functional connectivity imaging in mice. Biomed Opt Express. 2019; 10(11):5952-5973. PMC: 6865125. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.10.005952. View

3.
Raut R, Snyder A, Mitra A, Yellin D, Fujii N, Malach R . Global waves synchronize the brain's functional systems with fluctuating arousal. Sci Adv. 2021; 7(30). PMC: 8294763. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abf2709. View

4.
Musall S, Kaufman M, Juavinett A, Gluf S, Churchland A . Single-trial neural dynamics are dominated by richly varied movements. Nat Neurosci. 2019; 22(10):1677-1686. PMC: 6768091. DOI: 10.1038/s41593-019-0502-4. View

5.
Zalesky A, Fornito A, Bullmore E . Network-based statistic: identifying differences in brain networks. Neuroimage. 2010; 53(4):1197-207. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.041. View