» Articles » PMID: 38330307

The Utility of Coping Through Emotional Approach: A Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Health Psychol
Specialty Public Health
Date 2024 Feb 8
PMID 38330307
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to examine associations between attempts to cope with stressors through the two facets of emotional approach coping (EAC; i.e., processing and expressing stressor-related emotions) and indicators of physical and mental health.

Method: EBSCO databases including MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Collections were searched from inception to November 2022. In all, 86 studies were included in a meta-analytic evaluation using a random-effects model and meta-regression analysis.

Results: EAC was associated with better overall health ( = .05; = .04; 95% confidence interval = [.003, .10]). Emotional expression (EE) and emotional processing (EP) also were positively associated with better overall health, although these relationships were not statistically significant. In meta-regressions examining specific health domains, EAC was linked to better health in biological/physiological, physical, and resilience-related psychological adjustment domains, as well as to worse outcomes in the risk-related psychological adjustment and mental/emotional distress domains. Results for EE and EP mirrored this pattern; however, only EP was associated with more engagement in health-promoting behaviors.

Conclusions: Coping with stressors through emotional approach appears to be associated with better mental and physical health, with some observed differences for EE and EP. The literature on EAC and health is marked by heterogeneity across study methodologies and measures. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Citing Articles

Affect regulation and allostatic load over time.

Ng A, Gruenewald T, Juster R, Trudel-Fitzgerald C Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2024; 169:107163.

PMID: 39116519 PMC: 11856246. DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2024.107163.

References
1.
Watkins E . Constructive and unconstructive repetitive thought. Psychol Bull. 2008; 134(2):163-206. PMC: 2672052. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.163. View

2.
Lennon J, Hevey D, Kinsella L . Gender role conflict, emotional approach coping, self-compassion, and distress in prostate cancer patients: A model of direct and moderating effects. Psychooncology. 2018; 27(8):2009-2015. DOI: 10.1002/pon.4762. View

3.
Smith J, Lumley M, Longo D . Contrasting emotional approach coping with passive coping for chronic myofascial pain. Ann Behav Med. 2002; 24(4):326-35. DOI: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2404_09. View

4.
Segerstrom S, Roach A, Evans D, Schipper L, Darville A . The structure and health correlates of trait repetitive thought in older adults. Psychol Aging. 2010; 25(3):505-15. PMC: 2944001. DOI: 10.1037/a0019456. View

5.
Marroquin B, Czamanski-Cohen J, Weihs K, Stanton A . Implicit loneliness, emotion regulation, and depressive symptoms in breast cancer survivors. J Behav Med. 2016; 39(5):832-44. PMC: 5014704. DOI: 10.1007/s10865-016-9751-9. View