Evaluating the Effect of Denoising Submillimeter Auditory FMRI Data with NORDIC

Overview

Journal bioRxiv

Date 2024 Feb 8

PMID 38328173

Authors

Lonike K Faes

Agustin Lage-Castellanos

Giancarlo Valente

Zidan Yu

Martijn A Cloos

Luca Vizioli

Steen Moeller

Essa Yacoub

Federico De Martino

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has emerged as an essential tool for exploring human brain function. Submillimeter fMRI, in particular, has emerged as a tool to study mesoscopic computations. The inherently low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at submillimeter resolutions warrants the use of denoising approaches tailored at reducing thermal noise - the dominant contributing noise component in high resolution fMRI. NORDIC PCA is one of such approaches, and has been benchmarked against other approaches in several applications. Here, we investigate the effects that two versions of NORDIC denoising have on auditory submillimeter data. As investigating auditory functional responses poses unique challenges, we anticipated that the benefit of this technique would be especially pronounced. Our results show that NORDIC denoising improves the detection sensitivity and the reliability of estimates in submillimeter auditory fMRI data. These effects can be explained by the reduction of the noise-induced signal variability. However, we also observed a reduction in the average response amplitude (percent signal), which may suggest that a small amount of signal was also removed. We conclude that, while evaluating the effects of the signal reduction induced by NORDIC may be necessary for each application, using NORDIC in high resolution auditory fMRI studies may be advantageous because of the large reduction in variability of the estimated responses.

References

Olman C, Harel N, Feinberg D, He S, Zhang P, Ugurbil K . Layer-specific fMRI reflects different neuronal computations at different depths in human V1. PLoS One. 2012; 7(3):e32536. PMC: 3308958. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032536. View

Turner R, Geyer S . Comparing like with like: the power of knowing where you are. Brain Connect. 2014; 4(7):547-57. PMC: 4146387. DOI: 10.1089/brain.2014.0261. View

Schmithorst V, Brown R . Empirical validation of the triple-code model of numerical processing for complex math operations using functional MRI and group Independent Component Analysis of the mental addition and subtraction of fractions. Neuroimage. 2004; 22(3):1414-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.03.021. View

Vaughan J, Garwood M, Collins C, Liu W, Delabarre L, Adriany G . 7T vs. 4T: RF power, homogeneity, and signal-to-noise comparison in head images. Magn Reson Med. 2001; 46(1):24-30. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1156. View

Setsompop K, Cohen-Adad J, Gagoski B, Raij T, Yendiki A, Keil B . Improving diffusion MRI using simultaneous multi-slice echo planar imaging. Neuroimage. 2012; 63(1):569-80. PMC: 3429710. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.033. View

De Martino F, Gentile F, Esposito F, Balsi M, di Salle F, Goebel R . Classification of fMRI independent components using IC-fingerprints and support vector machine classifiers. Neuroimage. 2006; 34(1):177-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.08.041. View

Yacoub E, Shmuel A, Pfeuffer J, Van de Moortele P, Adriany G, Andersen P . Imaging brain function in humans at 7 Tesla. Magn Reson Med. 2001; 45(4):588-94. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1080. View

Kay K . The risk of bias in denoising methods: Examples from neuroimaging. PLoS One. 2022; 17(7):e0270895. PMC: 9249232. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270895. View

Michon K, Khammash D, Simmonite M, Hamlin A, Polk T . Person-specific and precision neuroimaging: Current methods and future directions. Neuroimage. 2022; 263:119589. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119589. View

10.

Kok P, Bains L, van Mourik T, Norris D, de Lange F . Selective Activation of the Deep Layers of the Human Primary Visual Cortex by Top-Down Feedback. Curr Biol. 2016; 26(3):371-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.12.038. View

11.

Pruim R, Mennes M, van Rooij D, Llera A, Buitelaar J, Beckmann C . ICA-AROMA: A robust ICA-based strategy for removing motion artifacts from fMRI data. Neuroimage. 2015; 112:267-277. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.064. View

12.

Menon R, Ogawa S, Hu X, Strupp J, Anderson P, Ugurbil K . BOLD based functional MRI at 4 Tesla includes a capillary bed contribution: echo-planar imaging correlates with previous optical imaging using intrinsic signals. Magn Reson Med. 1995; 33(3):453-9. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910330323. View

13.

Faes L, De Martino F, Huber L . Cerebral blood volume sensitive layer-fMRI in the human auditory cortex at 7T: Challenges and capabilities. PLoS One. 2023; 18(2):e0280855. PMC: 9910709. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280855. View

14.

Hu X, Le T, Parrish T, Erhard P . Retrospective estimation and correction of physiological fluctuation in functional MRI. Magn Reson Med. 1995; 34(2):201-12. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910340211. View

15.

Gau R, Bazin P, Trampel R, Turner R, Noppeney U . Resolving multisensory and attentional influences across cortical depth in sensory cortices. Elife. 2020; 9. PMC: 6984812. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.46856. View

16.

Triantafyllou C, Hoge R, Krueger G, Wiggins C, Potthast A, Wiggins G . Comparison of physiological noise at 1.5 T, 3 T and 7 T and optimization of fMRI acquisition parameters. Neuroimage. 2005; 26(1):243-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.01.007. View

17.

Triantafyllou C, Polimeni J, Wald L . Physiological noise and signal-to-noise ratio in fMRI with multi-channel array coils. Neuroimage. 2010; 55(2):597-606. PMC: 3039683. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.084. View

18.

Marques J, Kober T, Krueger G, van der Zwaag W, Van de Moortele P, Gruetter R . MP2RAGE, a self bias-field corrected sequence for improved segmentation and T1-mapping at high field. Neuroimage. 2009; 49(2):1271-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.002. View

19.

Ogawa S, Tank D, Menon R, Ellermann J, Kim S, Merkle H . Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992; 89(13):5951-5. PMC: 402116. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.89.13.5951. View

20.

Heynckes M, Lage-Castellanos A, de Weerd P, Formisano E, De Martino F . Layer-specific correlates of detected and undetected auditory targets during attention. Curr Res Neurobiol. 2023; 4:100075. PMC: 9900365. DOI: 10.1016/j.crneur.2023.100075. View