» Articles » PMID: 38327148

Bowel Health, Defecation Patterns and Nutrient Intake Following Adoption of a Vegan Diet: a Randomized-controlled Trial

Overview
Journal Ann Med
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Feb 8
PMID 38327148
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The beneficial effects of a plant-based diet on gut microbiota diversity are well documented, however, its impact on clinical bowel health and defecation patterns are less well understood. Vegetarian diets have been associated with a higher bowel movement (BM) frequency as well as softer stools in cross-sectional studies. The effects of the de-novo adoption of a vegan diet on bowel health, however, have never been investigated in a randomized-controlled trial.

Materials And Methods: The present study examined bowel health and defecation patterns in relation to diet and nutrient intake in a young and healthy sample of  = 65 physically-active German university students who were randomly assigned to either a vegan or a meat-rich diet for eight weeks. Bowel health assessment included the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS), the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) and the Cleveland Clinic Fecal Incontinence Score (CCFIS). Nutrient intake was assessed using weighed food diaries. The study was prospectively registered at the German Clinical Trial Register (DRKS00031541).

Results: Weekly BM frequency slightly increased in vegans, whereas it remained unaltered in participants assigned to a meat-rich diet. Fiber intake increased significantly in vegans (34.89 (18.46) g/d) whereas it decreased in those assigned to the meat-rich group (22.79 (12.5) g/d). No significant intergroup differences in BSFS and CCFIS patterns were observed. Adoption of a vegan diet neither resulted in a transient increase in abdominal discomfort nor in a decreased gastrointestinal quality of life, which was comparable across the diet groups.

Conclusions: The short-term adoption of a vegan diet did not negatively affect markers of bowel health in this study.

Citing Articles

Analyzing dietary exposure to critical nutrients on a plant-based diet using the food- and total nutrient index.

Storz M, Stubing F, Hannibal L, Huber R Nutr J. 2025; 24(1):39.

PMID: 40075422 PMC: 11899309. DOI: 10.1186/s12937-025-01105-9.

References
1.
Storz M, Muller A, Niederreiter L, Zimmermann-Klemd A, Suarez-Alvarez M, Kowarschik S . A cross-sectional study of nutritional status in healthy, young, physically-active German omnivores, vegetarians and vegans reveals adequate vitamin B status in supplemented vegans. Ann Med. 2023; 55(2):2269969. PMC: 10586079. DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2269969. View

2.
Nag A, Martin S, Mladsi D, Olayinka-Amao O, Purser M, Vekaria R . The Humanistic and Economic Burden of Chronic Idiopathic Constipation in the USA: A Systematic Literature Review. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2020; 13:255-265. PMC: 7371558. DOI: 10.2147/CEG.S239205. View

3.
Eypasch E, Williams J, Wood-Dauphinee S, Ure B, Schmulling C, Neugebauer E . Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index: development, validation and application of a new instrument. Br J Surg. 1995; 82(2):216-22. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800820229. View

4.
Giatti L, Camelo L, Rodrigues J, Barreto S . Reliability of the MacArthur scale of subjective social status - Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil). BMC Public Health. 2012; 12:1096. PMC: 3545723. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1096. View

5.
SanJoaquin M, Appleby P, Spencer E, Key T . Nutrition and lifestyle in relation to bowel movement frequency: a cross-sectional study of 20630 men and women in EPIC-Oxford. Public Health Nutr. 2004; 7(1):77-83. DOI: 10.1079/phn2003522. View