» Articles » PMID: 38323883

Regional Variations in the Management of Primary Hyperparathyroidism in Sweden: Population-based Case-control Study

Overview
Journal BJS Open
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2024 Feb 7
PMID 38323883
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Substantial disparities in the utilization of parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism have been reported. This study aimed to analyse regional variations in parathyroidectomy incidence with respect to the patient's disease burden and socioeconomic status.

Methods: A population-based case-control study included all patients with primary hyperparathyroidism who underwent parathyroidectomy in Sweden between 2008 and 2017 and 10 matched controls. Data on demographic and socioeconomic variables, co-morbidities and drug prescriptions were collected from relevant national registers. Conditional logistic regression was used to analyse predictors of parathyroidectomy.

Results: A total of 8626 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (77% women) underwent parathyroidectomy during the study interval. The annual incidence of parathyroidectomy was 9.0 per 100 000 persons. The annual age-adjusted regional incidences of parathyroidectomy varied between 3.3 and 16.9 operations per 100 000 inhabitants. Except for a small underrepresentation of patients with lower education, no effect of socioeconomic variables was observed. Compared with matched controls, the parathyroidectomy group had increased odds ratios of having developed classical symptoms of primary hyperparathyroidism and being prescribed medication against cardiovascular disorders and psychiatric illness at the time of parathyroidectomy. Increased risks of kidney stones and osteoporosis were observed 5 years before parathyroidectomy. Patients with primary hyperparathyroidism selected for parathyroidectomy from regions with a low incidence of operations had a higher prevalence of kidney stones, osteoporosis and hypertension, as well as larger adenomas and higher calcium levels at the time of parathyroidectomy compared with patients in high-incidence regions.

Conclusion: The considerable variation in parathyroidectomy seems more likely associated with different clinical thresholds for detection of primary hyperparathyroidism and referral to surgery than socioeconomic disparities.

References
1.
Yu N, Donnan P, Murphy M, Leese G . Epidemiology of primary hyperparathyroidism in Tayside, Scotland, UK. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2009; 71(4):485-93. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2008.03520.x. View

2.
Wilhelm S, Wang T, Ruan D, Lee J, Asa S, Duh Q . The American Association of Endocrine Surgeons Guidelines for Definitive Management of Primary Hyperparathyroidism. JAMA Surg. 2016; 151(10):959-968. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.2310. View

3.
Bollerslev J, Rejnmark L, Zahn A, Heck A, Appelman-Dijkstra N, Cardoso L . European Expert Consensus on Practical Management of Specific Aspects of Parathyroid Disorders in Adults and in Pregnancy: Recommendations of the ESE Educational Program of Parathyroid Disorders. Eur J Endocrinol. 2021; 186(2):R33-R63. PMC: 8789028. DOI: 10.1530/EJE-21-1044. View

4.
Wu B, Haigh P, Hwang R, Ituarte P, Liu I, Hahn T . Underutilization of parathyroidectomy in elderly patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010; 95(9):4324-30. PMC: 2936062. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2009-2819. View

5.
Weber T, Dotzenrath C, Dralle H, Niederle B, Riss P, Holzer K . Management of primary and renal hyperparathyroidism: guidelines from the German Association of Endocrine Surgeons (CAEK). Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021; 406(3):571-585. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-021-02173-1. View