Use of Standardised Outcome Measures Among Physiotherapists in French-speaking Sub-Saharan Africa

Overview

Journal S Afr J Physiother

Specialty Rehabilitation Medicine

Date 2024 Feb 7

PMID 38322653

Authors

Abdoulaye Sawadogo

Emmanuel Segnon Sogbossi

Gauthier J Everard

Toussaint Kpadonou

Charles Sebiyo Batcho

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The use of standardised assessment tools is a fundamental aspect of good clinical practice. However, to our knowledge, no study has documented the use of standardised assessment tools in physiotherapy in French-speaking sub-Saharan Africa.

Objectives: Documenting the use of standardised outcome measures in physiotherapy in French-speaking sub-Saharan Africa.

Method: Our cross-sectional survey used an online self-questionnaire on facilitators and barriers to the use of standardised outcome measures, distributed to physiotherapists in French-speaking sub-Saharan Africa.

Results: A total of 241 physiotherapists working in French-speaking sub-Saharan Africa responded to the survey. The most represented countries were Benin (36.9%), Cameroon (14.1%), and Burkina Faso (10.8%). Although 99% of participants reported using standardised outcome measures, only 27% of the respondents used them systematically (all the time). The most reported facilitators included the recognition that standardised outcome measures help to determine whether treatment is effective, help to guide care, and improve communication with patients. The most significant barriers were the lack of time, unavailability of the standardised outcome measures, and non-sensitivity of measures to patients' cultural and ethnic concerns. There was a higher proportion of use in the middle age group (30-40) ( = 0.02) and a lower proportion of use in physiotherapists simultaneously working in public and private sectors ( = 0.05).

Conclusion: Standardised outcome measures are still not widely used by physiotherapists in French-speaking sub-Saharan Africa.

Clinical Implications: The perceived barriers and facilitators could help to develop strategies to improve the systematic use of outcome measures in French-speaking sub-Saharan Africa.

References

Kossi O, Amanzonwe E, Thonnard J, Batcho C . Applicability of International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-based participation measures in stroke survivors in Africa: a systematic review. Int J Rehabil Res. 2019; 43(1):3-11. DOI: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000377. View

Al-Muqiren T, Al-Eisa E, Alghadir A, Anwer S . Implementation and use of standardized outcome measures by physical therapists in Saudi Arabia: barriers, facilitators and perceptions. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017; 17(1):748. PMC: 5697212. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2693-2. View

Gutierrez Panchana T, Hidalgo Cabalin V . Adherence to standardized assessments through a complexity-based model for categorizing rehabilitation©: design and implementation in an acute hospital. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018; 18(1):21. PMC: 5848603. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-018-0590-1. View

Odole A, Odunaiya N, Ojo J, Akinpelu A . Factors influencing the use of outcome measures in knee osteoarthritis: A mixed method study of physiotherapists in Nigeria. Physiother Theory Pract. 2018; 35(12):1259-1268. DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2018.1471762. View

Swinkels R, van Peppen R, Wittink H, Custers J, Beurskens A . Current use and barriers and facilitators for implementation of standardised measures in physical therapy in the Netherlands. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011; 12:106. PMC: 3126762. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-106. View

Parry S, Granger C, Berney S, Jones J, Beach L, El-Ansary D . Assessment of impairment and activity limitations in the critically ill: a systematic review of measurement instruments and their clinimetric properties. Intensive Care Med. 2015; 41(5):744-62. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-015-3672-x. View

Jette D, Halbert J, Iverson C, Miceli E, Shah P . Use of standardized outcome measures in physical therapist practice: perceptions and applications. Phys Ther. 2008; 89(2):125-35. DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20080234. View

Potter K, Fulk G, Salem Y, Sullivan J . Outcome measures in neurological physical therapy practice: part I. Making sound decisions. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2011; 35(2):57-64. DOI: 10.1097/NPT.0b013e318219a51a. View

Verheyden G, Meyer S . 'To Measure is to Know.' Advancing the Use of Outcome Measures in the Physiotherapy Profession. Physiother Res Int. 2016; 21(1):1-3. DOI: 10.1002/pri.1662. View

10.

Eilayyan O, Visca R, Zidarov D, Ware P, Bussieres A, Ahmed S . Developing theory-informed knowledge translation strategies to facilitate the use of patient-reported outcome measures in interdisciplinary low back pain clinical practices in Quebec: mixed methods study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020; 20(1):789. PMC: 7445906. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05616-5. View

11.

Colquhoun H, Lamontagne M, Duncan E, Fiander M, Champagne C, Grimshaw J . A systematic review of interventions to increase the use of standardized outcome measures by rehabilitation professionals. Clin Rehabil. 2016; 31(3):299-309. DOI: 10.1177/0269215516644309. View

12.

Bausewein C, Schildmann E, Rosenbruch J, Haberland B, Tanzler S, Ramsenthaler C . Starting from scratch: implementing outcome measurement in clinical practice. Ann Palliat Med. 2018; 7(Suppl 3):S253-S261. DOI: 10.21037/apm.2018.06.08. View

13.

Agyenkwa S, Yarfi C, Banson A, Kofi-Bediako W, Abonie U, Angmorterh S . Assessing the Use of Standardized Outcome Measures for Stroke Rehabilitation among Physiotherapists in Ghana. Stroke Res Treat. 2020; 2020:9259017. PMC: 7349619. DOI: 10.1155/2020/9259017. View

14.

Braun T, Rieckmann A, Weber F, Gruneberg C . Current use of measurement instruments by physiotherapists working in Germany: a cross-sectional online survey. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018; 18(1):810. PMC: 6199696. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3563-2. View

15.

Antunes B, Harding R, Higginson I . Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in palliative care clinical practice: a systematic review of facilitators and barriers. Palliat Med. 2013; 28(2):158-75. DOI: 10.1177/0269216313491619. View

16.

Sogbossi E, Thonnard J, Batcho C . Assessing locomotion ability in West African stroke patients: validation of ABILOCO-Benin scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014; 95(8):1470-6.e3. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.03.002. View

17.

Amuasi J, Agbogbatey M, Sarfo F, Beyuo A, Duah K, Agasiya P . Feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of a mobile health stroke intervention among Ghanaian health workers. J Neurol Sci. 2022; 439:120304. DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2022.120304. View

18.

Kall I, Larsson M, Bernhardsson S . Use of outcome measures improved after a tailored implementation in primary care physiotherapy: a prospective, controlled study. J Eval Clin Pract. 2016; 22(5):668-76. DOI: 10.1111/jep.12513. View

19.

Sharma A, Duc N, Luu Lam Thang T, Nam N, Ng S, Abbas K . A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS). J Gen Intern Med. 2021; 36(10):3179-3187. PMC: 8481359. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-06737-1. View

20.

van Peppen R, Maissan F, van Genderen F, van Dolder R, van Meeteren N . Outcome measures in physiotherapy management of patients with stroke: a survey into self-reported use, and barriers to and facilitators for use. Physiother Res Int. 2008; 13(4):255-70. DOI: 10.1002/pri.417. View