» Articles » PMID: 38322435

Effect of Speaking Valves on Tracheostomy Decannulation

Overview
Publisher Thieme
Date 2024 Feb 7
PMID 38322435
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

 Despite several pediatric tracheostomy decannulation protocols there remains tremendous variability in practice. The effect of tracheostomy capping on decannulation has been studied but the role of speaking valves (SVs) is unknown.  Given the positive benefits SVs have on rehabilitation, we hypothesized that SVs would decrease time to tracheostomy decannulation. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate this in a subset of patients with chronic lung disease of prematurity (CLD).  A retrospective chart review was performed at a tertiary care children's hospital. A total of 105 patients with tracheostomies and CLD were identified. Data collected included demographics, gestational age, congenital cardiac disease, airway surgeries, granulation tissue excisions, SV and capping trials, tracheitis episodes, and clinic visits. Statistics were performed with logistic and linear regression.  A total of 75 patients were included. The mean gestational age was 27 weeks (standard deviation [SD] = 3.6) and the average birthweight was 1.1 kg (SD = 0.6). The average age at tracheostomy was 122 days (SD = 63). A total of 70.7% of the patients underwent decannulation and the mean time to decannulation (TTD) was 37 months (SD = 19). A total of 77.3% of the patients had SVs. Those with an SV had a longer TTD compared to those without (52 versus 35 months;  = 0.008). Decannulation was increased by 2 months for every increase in the number of hospital presentations for tracheitis (  = 0.011).  The present study is the first, to our knowledge, to assess the effect of SVs on tracheostomy decannulation in patients with CLD showing a longer TTD when SVs are used.

Citing Articles

Pediatric Tracheostomy Year in Review.

Willis L Respir Care. 2024; 69(8):1025-1032.

PMID: 38626953 PMC: 11298220. DOI: 10.4187/respcare.11932.

References
1.
Mahadevan M, Barber C, Salkeld L, Douglas G, Mills N . Pediatric tracheotomy: 17 year review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2007; 71(12):1829-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2007.08.007. View

2.
Fraser J, Pengilly A, Mok Q . Long-term ventilator-dependent children: a vocal profile analysis. Pediatr Rehabil. 1998; 2(2):71-5. DOI: 10.3109/17518429809068158. View

3.
Lichtman S, Birnbaum I, Sanfilippo M, Pellicone J, Damon W, King M . Effect of a tracheostomy speaking valve on secretions, arterial oxygenation, and olfaction: a quantitative evaluation. J Speech Hear Res. 1995; 38(3):549-55. DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3803.549. View

4.
Falla P, Westhoff J, Bosch N, Federspil P . Factors influencing time-dependent decannulation after pediatric tracheostomy according to the Kaplan-Meier method. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020; 277(4):1139-1147. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-05827-w. View

5.
Stachler R, Hamlet S, Choi J, Fleming S . Scintigraphic quantification of aspiration reduction with the Passy-Muir valve. Laryngoscope. 1996; 106(2 Pt 1):231-4. DOI: 10.1097/00005537-199602000-00024. View