» Articles » PMID: 38317782

Demoralization in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Treatment and Predictive Factors Associated with Its Persistence

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2024 Feb 6
PMID 38317782
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background/objective: Although demoralization is associated with morbidity and mortality in cardiac settings, its treatment has been overlooked. The present randomized controlled trial aimed at 1) evaluating the effectiveness of sequential combination of Cognitive-Behavioral and Well-Being therapies (CBT/WBT), compared to Clinical Management (CM), on demoralization among Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS) patients, at post-treatment and after 3 months; 2) examining ACS patients' characteristics predicting demoralization persistence at 3-month follow-up.

Method: 91 demoralized ACS patients were randomized to CBT/WBT ( = 47) or CM ( = 44). Demoralization was assessed with an interview on Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatics Research at baseline, post-treatment and 3-month follow-up. Predictors of demoralization maintenance included cardiac parameters, psychological distress and well-being.

Results: Compared to CM, CBT/WBT significantly reduced demoralization post-treatment. Somatization (odds ratio = 1.11;  = 0.027) and history of depression (odds ratio = 5.16;  = 0.004) were risk factors associated with demoralization persistence at follow-up, whereas positive relationships (odds ratio = 0.94;  = 0.005) represented protective factors.

Conclusions: The study provides preliminary and promising evidence on the benefits of CBT/WBT in treating demoralization in ACS patients. Moreover, ACS patients with somatization or positive history of depression could be at higher risk for developing persistent demoralization.

Citing Articles

Incidence and Influencing Factors of Demoralization Syndrome in Elderly Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients: A Multi-Center Cross-Sectional Study.

Zhang H, Yang L, Xing X, Huang Y, Lv X Int J Gen Med. 2025; 18:787-797.

PMID: 39974563 PMC: 11837754. DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S511458.


Demoralization: A concept analysis through a scoping review methodology.

Hua R, Bhatarasakoon P Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024; 8:100272.

PMID: 39737059 PMC: 11683301. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100272.

References
1.
Dettori J, Norvell D, Chapman J . The Sin of Missing Data: Is All Forgiven by Way of Imputation?. Global Spine J. 2018; 8(8):892-894. PMC: 6293424. DOI: 10.1177/2192568218811922. View

2.
Fava G, Freyberger H, Bech P, Christodoulou G, Sensky T, Theorell T . Diagnostic criteria for use in psychosomatic research. Psychother Psychosom. 1995; 63(1):1-8. DOI: 10.1159/000288931. View

3.
Piolanti A, Offidani E, Guidi J, Gostoli S, Fava G, Sonino N . Use of the Psychosocial Index: A Sensitive Tool in Research and Practice. Psychother Psychosom. 2016; 85(6):337-345. DOI: 10.1159/000447760. View

4.
Hsu C, Tung H, Wu Y, Wei J, Tsay S . Demoralization syndrome among cardiac transplant recipients. J Clin Nurs. 2021; 31(15-16):2271-2286. DOI: 10.1111/jocn.16045. View

5.
Bailey C, Doyle Z, Dearin J, Michael N, Kissane D . Demoralization and chronic illness in rural Australia: A cross-sectional survey. Palliat Support Care. 2019; 18(3):271-276. DOI: 10.1017/S1478951519000841. View