» Articles » PMID: 38315234

Critical ICP Thresholds in Relation to Outcome: Is 22 mmHg Really the Answer?

Overview
Specialty Neurosurgery
Date 2024 Feb 5
PMID 38315234
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Intensive care for patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) aims, among other tasks, at avoiding high intracranial pressure (ICP), which is perceived to worsen motor and cognitive deficits and increase mortality. International recommendations for threshold values for ICP were increased from 20 to 22 mmHg in 2016 following the findings in a study by Sorrentino et al., which were based on an observational study of patients with TBI of averaged ICP values. We aimed to reproduce their approach and validate the findings in a separate cohort.

Methods: Three hundred thirty-one patients with TBI were included and categorised according to survival/death and favourable/unfavourable outcome at 6 months (based on Glasgow Outcome Score-Extended of 6-8 and 1-5, respectively). Repeated chi-square tests of survival and death (or favourable and unfavourable outcome) vs. high and low ICP were conducted with discrimination between high and low ICP sets at increasing values (integers) between 10 and 35 mmHg, using the average ICP for the entire monitoring period. The ICP limit returning the highest chi-square score was assumed to be the threshold with best discriminative ability. This approach was repeated after stratification by sex, age, and initial Glasgow Coma Score (GCS).

Results: An ICP limit of 18 mmHg was found for both mortality and unfavourable outcome for the entire cohort. The female and the low GCS subgroups both had threshold values of 18 mmHg; for all other subgroups, the threshold varied between 16 and 30 mmHg. According to a multiple logistic regression analysis, age, initial GCS, and average ICP are independently associated with mortality and outcome.

Conclusions: Using identical methods and closely comparable cohorts, the critical thresholds for ICP found in the study by Sorrentino et al. could not be reproduced.

Citing Articles

Validation of a Noninvasive Approach for Cerebrospinal Compliance Monitoring.

Brasil S, Ben-Hur I, Cardim D, Czosnyka M, Paiva W, Frigieri G Neurocrit Care. 2025; .

PMID: 39920544 DOI: 10.1007/s12028-024-02205-w.


Machine learning approach for noninvasive intracranial pressure estimation using pulsatile cranial expansion waveforms.

Frigieri G, Brasil S, Cardim D, Czosnyka M, Ferreira M, Paiva W NPJ Digit Med. 2025; 8(1):57.

PMID: 39865121 PMC: 11770073. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-025-01463-y.


Managing Intracranial Pressure Crisis.

Viarasilpa T Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2024; 25(1):12.

PMID: 39699775 PMC: 11659353. DOI: 10.1007/s11910-024-01392-5.


A Comprehensive Perspective on Intracranial Pressure Monitoring and Individualized Management in Neurocritical Care: Results of a Survey with Global Experts.

Brasil S, Godoy D, Videtta W, Rubiano A, Solla D, Taccone F Neurocrit Care. 2024; 41(3):880-892.

PMID: 38811514 PMC: 11599332. DOI: 10.1007/s12028-024-02008-z.

References
1.
Castellani G, Zweifel C, Kim D, Carrera E, Radolovich D, Smielewski P . Plateau waves in head injured patients requiring neurocritical care. Neurocrit Care. 2009; 11(2):143-50. DOI: 10.1007/s12028-009-9235-7. View

2.
Chesnut R, Bleck T, Citerio G, Classen J, Cooper D, Coplin W . A Consensus-Based Interpretation of the Benchmark Evidence from South American Trials: Treatment of Intracranial Pressure Trial. J Neurotrauma. 2015; 32(22):1722-4. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2015.3976. View

3.
Sackett D, Rosenberg W, Gray J, Haynes R, Richardson W . Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ. 1996; 312(7023):71-2. PMC: 2349778. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71. View

4.
Bratton S, Chestnut R, Ghajar J, McConnell Hammond F, Harris O, Hartl R . Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. VI. Indications for intracranial pressure monitoring. J Neurotrauma. 2007; 24 Suppl 1:S37-44. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2007.9990. View

5.
Reinstrup P, Unnerback M, Marklund N, Schalen W, Arrocha J, Bloomfield E . Best zero level for external ICP transducer. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2019; 161(4):635-642. PMC: 6431298. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-019-03856-x. View