» Articles » PMID: 38304560

Detoxification of Corn Stover Prehydrolysate by Different Biochars and Its Effect on Lactic Acid Fermentation

Overview
Journal RSC Adv
Specialty Chemistry
Date 2024 Feb 2
PMID 38304560
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

During the utilization of lignocellulosic biomass such as corn stover, many by-products are produced in the pretreatment process that can severely inhibit the activity of microbes in the fermentation step. To achieve efficient biomass conversion, detoxification is usually required before microbial fermentation. In this study, the prehydrolysate from dilute acid pretreatment of corn stover was used as a lactic acid fermentation substrate. Biochars made from corn stover (CSB), cow manure (CMB), and a mixture of corn stover and cow manure (MB) were applied for the detoxification of the prehydrolysate. All three types of biochar had a porous structure with a specific surface area ranging from 4.08 m g (CMB) to 7.03 m g (MB). After detoxification, both the numbers of inhibitors and their concentrations in the prehydrolysate decreased, indicating that the biochars prepared in this study were effective in inhibitor removal. The concentration of lactic acid obtained from the prehydrolysate without detoxification was only 12.43 g L after fermentation for 96 h with a productivity of 0.13 g (L h). Although the specific area of CMB was the lowest among the three biochars, the CMB-treated prehydrolysate resulted in the highest lactic acid concentration of 39.25 g L at 96 h with a productivity of 0.41 g (L h). The lactic acid bacteria in the CMB-treated prehydrolysate grew faster than the other two biochars, reaching an OD value of 8.12 at 48 h. The results showed promise for the use of agricultural wastes to make biochar to increase the yield of lactic acid fermentation through the detoxification process.

References
1.
Zhang L, Li X, Yong Q, Yang S, Ouyang J, Yu S . Impacts of lignocellulose-derived inhibitors on L-lactic acid fermentation by Rhizopus oryzae. Bioresour Technol. 2016; 203:173-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.12.014. View

2.
Dai Y, Zhang N, Xing C, Cui Q, Sun Q . The adsorption, regeneration and engineering applications of biochar for removal organic pollutants: A review. Chemosphere. 2019; 223:12-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.161. View

3.
Gao Y, Jiang Z, Li J, Xie W, Jiang Q, Bi M . A comparison of the characteristics and atrazine adsorption capacity of co-pyrolysed and mixed biochars generated from corn straw and sawdust. Environ Res. 2019; 172:561-568. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.03.010. View

4.
Persson P, Andersson J, Gorton L, Larsson S, Nilvebrant N, Jonsson L . Effect of different forms of alkali treatment on specific fermentation inhibitors and on the fermentability of lignocellulose hydrolysates for production of fuel ethanol. J Agric Food Chem. 2002; 50(19):5318-25. DOI: 10.1021/jf025565o. View

5.
do Nascimento B, Bezerra de Araujo C, do Nascimento A, da Silva F, de Melo D, Jaguaribe E . Detoxification of sisal bagasse hydrolysate using activated carbon produced from the gasification of açaí waste. J Hazard Mater. 2020; 409:124494. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124494. View