» Articles » PMID: 38303868

Oral Soft Tissue Biopsy Surgery: Current Principles and Key Tissue Stabilization Techniques

Overview
Journal J Dent Sci
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2024 Feb 2
PMID 38303868
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There are different kinds of benign and malignant lesions in the oral cavity. Clinically, definite diagnosis can be confirmed only by doing adequate surgical biopsy and subsequent histopathological examination. Inadequate biopsy technique, unsuitable selection of the location for biopsy, inappropriate tissue handling and record of patients' information may lead to artifacts and misdiagnosis by the oral pathologists. Soft tissue stabilization is a challenge during oral surgery procedures. It needs the cooperation of operator, assistants, and patients to overcome the difficulty and ensure the successful outcome. In this article, we reviewed the procedures for clinical surgical biopsy, and raised three current tissue stabilization methods including fingers and gauze stabilization, stabilization with chalazion forceps and adapted instruments, and stabilization with retraction sutures. Moreover, some limitations were also presented. Clinician should examine the clinical characteristics of the oral lesion, the surrounding anatomical structures, and their own clinical experience and preference to select the appropriate tool. More understanding of these biopsy and tissue stabilization methods can effectively improve the biopsy procedures and obtain adequate tissues for histopathological examination and subsequent issue of an accurate pathological report.

Citing Articles

Efficacy of Tocopherol vs. Chlorhexidine in the Management of Oral Biopsy Site: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Baldin A, Nucibella C, Manera C, Bacci C J Clin Med. 2025; 14(3).

PMID: 39941458 PMC: 11818331. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14030788.


Assessment of a Bioimpedance-Based Method for the Diagnosis of Oral Cancer.

Horvat Sikonja K, Richter I, Grgic M, Grsic K, Leovic D, Batelja Vuletic L Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 14(24.

PMID: 39767256 PMC: 11675457. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14242894.


Surgical advantage of modified labial salivary gland biopsy using chalazion forceps: a prospective randomized controlled study.

Li C, Zheng W, Tian Y, Chen Y, Chui S, Luo Y Clin Exp Med. 2024; 24(1):175.

PMID: 39105891 PMC: 11303466. DOI: 10.1007/s10238-024-01428-7.


Perspectives on oral tissue biopsy surgery for patients with oral premalignant and malignant lesions.

Liu W, Li H, Shi L J Dent Sci. 2024; 19(3):1877-1879.

PMID: 39035331 PMC: 11259640. DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2024.02.017.

References
1.
Jain N . Essentials Before Sending Biopsy Specimens: A Surgeon's Prespective and Pathologists Concern. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2012; 10(4):361-4. PMC: 3267913. DOI: 10.1007/s12663-011-0234-9. View

2.
Alsharif M, Alsharif A, Krsoum M, Aljohani M, Qadiri O, Alharbi A . Trend Analysis of Head and Neck Neoplasms between 2012-2018 in Patients Residing in Al-Madinah, Saudi Arabia: A Retrospective Study. Eur J Dent. 2021; 15(3):509-514. PMC: 8382446. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1722090. View

3.
BAGGISH M, Barash F, Noel Y, Brooks M . Comparison of thermal injury zones in loop electrical and laser cervical excisional conization. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992; 166(2):545-8. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(92)91668-z. View

4.
Lopez Jornet P, Nicolas A, Martinez Beneyto Y, Fernandez Soria M . Attitude towards oral biopsy among general dentists in Murcia. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2007; 12(2):E116-21. View

5.
Rastogi V, Puri N, Arora S, Kaur G, Yadav L, Sharma R . Artefacts: a diagnostic dilemma - a review. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013; 7(10):2408-13. PMC: 3843421. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/6170.3541. View