» Articles » PMID: 38297817

Head and Eye Movements Reveal Compensatory Strategies for Acute Binaural Deficits During Sound Localization

Overview
Journal Trends Hear
Date 2024 Feb 1
PMID 38297817
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The present study aimed to define use of head and eye movements during sound localization in children and adults to: (1) assess effects of stationary versus moving sound and (2) define effects of binaural cues degraded through acute monaural ear plugging. Thirty-three youth (= 12.9 years) and seventeen adults (= 24.6 years) with typical hearing were recruited and asked to localize white noise anywhere within a horizontal arc from -60° (left) to +60° (right) azimuth in two conditions (typical binaural and right ear plugged). In each trial, sound was presented at an initial stationary position (L1) and then while moving at ∼4°/s until reaching a second position (L2). Sound moved in five conditions (±40°, ±20°, or 0°). Participants adjusted a laser pointer to indicate L1 and L2 positions. Unrestricted head and eye movements were collected with gyroscopic sensors on the head and eye-tracking glasses, respectively. Results confirmed that accurate sound localization of both stationary and moving sound is disrupted by acute monaural ear plugging. Eye movements preceded head movements for sound localization in normal binaural listening and head movements were larger than eye movements during monaural plugging. Head movements favored the unplugged left ear when stationary sounds were presented in the right hemifield and during sound motion in both hemifields regardless of the movement direction. Disrupted binaural cues have greater effects on localization of moving than stationary sound. Head movements reveal preferential use of the better-hearing ear and relatively stable eye positions likely reflect normal vestibular-ocular reflexes.

Citing Articles

Previous binaural experience supports compensatory strategies in hearing-impaired children's auditory horizontal localization.

Gulli A, Fontana F, Aruffo A, Orzan E, Muzzi E PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0312073.

PMID: 39637020 PMC: 11620673. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312073.

References
1.
Isaiah A, Vongpaisal T, King A, Hartley D . Multisensory training improves auditory spatial processing following bilateral cochlear implantation. J Neurosci. 2014; 34(33):11119-30. PMC: 4131019. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4767-13.2014. View

2.
Getzmann S, Lewald J . Localization of moving sound. Percept Psychophys. 2007; 69(6):1022-34. DOI: 10.3758/bf03193940. View

3.
Gordon K, Deighton M, Abbasalipour P, Papsin B . Perception of binaural cues develops in children who are deaf through bilateral cochlear implantation. PLoS One. 2014; 9(12):e114841. PMC: 4273969. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114841. View

4.
Garcia-Uceda Calvo J, van Wanrooij M, Van Opstal A . Adaptive Response Behavior in the Pursuit of Unpredictably Moving Sounds. eNeuro. 2021; 8(3). PMC: 8116108. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0556-20.2021. View

5.
Goossens H, Van Opstal A . Influence of head position on the spatial representation of acoustic targets. J Neurophysiol. 1999; 81(6):2720-36. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1999.81.6.2720. View