» Articles » PMID: 38295026

Wearable-derived Maternal Heart Rate Variability As a Novel Digital Biomarker of Preterm Birth

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2024 Jan 31
PMID 38295026
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Despite considerable health consequences from preterm births, their incidence remains unchanged over recent decades, due partially to limited screening methods and limited use of extant methods. Wearable technology offers a novel, noninvasive, and acceptable way to track vital signs, such as maternal heart rate variability (mHRV). Previous research observed that mHRV declines throughout the first 33 weeks of gestation in term, singleton pregnancies, after which it improves. The aim of this study was to explore whether mHRV inflection is a feature of gestational age or an indication of time to delivery. This retrospective case-control study considered term and preterm deliveries. Remote data collection via non-invasive wearable technology enabled diverse participation with subjects representing 42 US states and 16 countries. Participants (N = 241) were retroactively identified from the WHOOP (Whoop, Inc.) userbase and wore WHOOP straps during singleton pregnancies between March 2021 and October 2022. Mixed effect spline models by gestational age and time until birth were fit for within-person mHRV, grouped into preterm and term births. For term pregnancies, gestational age (Akaike information criterion (AIC) = 26627.6, R2m = 0.0109, R2c = 0.8571) and weeks until birth (AIC = 26616.3, R2m = 0.0112, R2c = 0.8576) were representative of mHRV trends, with significantly stronger fit for weeks until birth (relative log-likelihood ratio = 279.5). For preterm pregnancies, gestational age (AIC = 1861.9, R2m = 0.0016, R2c = 0.8582) and time until birth (AIC = 1848.0, R2m = 0.0100, R2c = 0.8676) were representative of mHRV trends, with significantly stronger fit for weeks until birth (relative log-likelihood ratio = 859.4). This study suggests that wearable technology, such as the WHOOP strap, may provide a digital biomarker for preterm delivery by screening for changes in nighttime mHRV throughout pregnancy that could in turn alert to the need for further evaluation and intervention.

Citing Articles

Deep learning model using continuous skin temperature data predicts labor onset.

Basavaraj C, Grant A, Aras S, Erickson E BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024; 24(1):777.

PMID: 39587525 PMC: 11587739. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06862-9.


Preterm birth risk stratification through longitudinal heart rate and HRV monitoring in daily life.

Feli M, Azimi I, Sarhaddi F, Sharifi-Heris Z, Niela-Vilen H, Liljeberg P Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):19896.

PMID: 39191907 PMC: 11349982. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-70773-0.


Phenotyping the autonomic nervous system in pregnancy using remote sensors: potential for complication prediction.

Sharifi-Heris Z, Yang Z, Rahmani A, Fortier M, Sharifiheris H, Bender M Front Physiol. 2023; 14:1293946.

PMID: 38074317 PMC: 10702512. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1293946.


Predicting labor onset relative to the estimated date of delivery using smart ring physiological data.

Erickson E, Gotlieb N, Pereira L, Myatt L, Mosquera-Lopez C, Jacobs P NPJ Digit Med. 2023; 6(1):153.

PMID: 37598232 PMC: 10439919. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-023-00902-y.

References
1.
Miller D, Sargent C, Roach G . A Validation of Six Wearable Devices for Estimating Sleep, Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability in Healthy Adults. Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(16). PMC: 9412437. DOI: 10.3390/s22166317. View

2.
Sajjadieh A, Shahsavari A, Safaei A, Penzel T, Schoebel C, Fietze I . The Association of Sleep Duration and Quality with Heart Rate Variability and Blood Pressure. Tanaffos. 2020; 19(2):135-143. PMC: 7680518. View

3.
Wakefield C, Yao L, Self S, Frasch M . Wearable technology for health monitoring during pregnancy: an observational cross-sectional survey study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022; 308(1):73-78. PMC: 9281287. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-022-06705-y. View

4.
Faron G, Balepa L, Parra J, Fils J, Gucciardo L . The fetal fibronectin test: 25 years after its development, what is the evidence regarding its clinical utility? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018; 33(3):493-523. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1491031. View

5.
Catov J, Parker C, Gibbs B, Bann C, Carper B, Silver R . Patterns of leisure-time physical activity across pregnancy and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018; 15(1):68. PMC: 6042402. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-018-0701-5. View