Gait Alterations in Patients with Adult Spinal Deformity

Overview

Journal N Am Spine Soc J

Date 2024 Jan 31

PMID 38293567

Authors

Stephanie M D Huysmans

Rachel Senden

Eva Jacobs

Paul J B Willems

Rik G J Marcellis

Mark van den Boogaart

Kenneth Meijer

Paul C Willems

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Adult spinal deformity patients (ASD) experience altered spinal alignment affecting spatiotemporal parameters and joint kinematics. Differences in spinal deformity between patients with symptomatic idiopathic scoliosis (ID-ASD) and patients with "de novo" scoliosis (DN-ASD) may affect gait characteristics differently. This study aims to compare gait characteristics between ID-ASD, DN-ASD, and asymptomatic healthy matched controls.

Methods: In this observational case-control study, ID-ASD (n = 24) and DN-ASD (n = 26) patients visiting the out-patient spine clinic and scheduled for long-segment spinal fusion were included. Patients were matched, based on age, gender, leg length and BMI, with asymptomatic healthy controls. Gait was measured at comfortable walking speed on an instrumented treadmill with 3D motion capture system. Trunk, pelvic and lower extremities range of motion (ROM) and spatiotemporal parameters (SPT) are presented as median (first and thirds quartile). Independent t-test or Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare ID-ASD, DN-ASD and controls. Statistical Parametric Mapping (independent t-test) was used to compare 3D joint kinematics.

Results: DN-ASD patients walk with increased anterior trunk tilt during the whole gait cycle compared with ID-ASD patients and controls. ID-ASD walk with decreased trunk lateroflexion compared with DN-ASD and controls. DN-ASD showed decreased pelvic obliquity and -rotation, increased knee flexion, and decreased ankle plantar flexion. ID-ASD and DN-ASD displayed decreased trunk, pelvic and lower extremity ROM compared with controls, but increased pelvic tilt ROM. ID-ASD patients walked with comparable SPT to controls, whereas DN-ASD patients walked significantly slower with corresponding changes in SPT and wider steps.

Conclusions: DN-ASD patients exhibit distinct alterations in SPT and kinematic gait characteristics compared with ID-ASD and controls. These alterations seem to be predominantly influenced by sagittal spinal malalignment and kinematic findings in ASD patients should not be generalized as such, but always be interpreted with consideration for the nature of the ASD.

Citing Articles

Effects of spinal deformities on lower limb kinematics during walking: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Khorramroo F, Mousavi S, Rajabi R Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):4608.

PMID: 39920271 PMC: 11806027. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-88886-5.

Alignment considerations in degenerative spinal conditions: A narrative review.

Challier V, Nassar J, Castelain J, Campana M, Jacquemin C, Ghailane S N Am Spine Soc J. 2024; 20:100562.

PMID: 39554214 PMC: 11565030. DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100562.

Evaluation and Rehabilitation after Adult Lumbar Spine Surgery.

Sakaguchi T, Gunjotikar S, Tanaka M, Komatsubara T, Latka K, Ekade S J Clin Med. 2024; 13(10).

PMID: 38792457 PMC: 11122457. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13102915.

Relationship between Body Composition and Gait Characteristics in Patients with Cerebral Small Vessel Disease.

Xie H, Xia Z, Xia C, Zhang N, Ding Y, Zhao H Curr Neurovasc Res. 2024; 21(2):205-213.

PMID: 38551042 DOI: 10.2174/0115672026307602240321081657.

References

Simon A, Lugade V, Bernhardt K, Larson A, Kaufman K . Assessment of stability during gait in patients with spinal deformity-A preliminary analysis using the dynamic stability margin. Gait Posture. 2017; 55:37-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.03.036. View

Pistacchi M, Gioulis M, Sanson F, De Giovannini E, Filippi G, Rossetto F . Gait analysis and clinical correlations in early Parkinson's disease. Funct Neurol. 2017; 32(1):28-34. PMC: 5505527. DOI: 10.11138/fneur/2017.32.1.028. View

Haddas R, Ju K, Belanger T, Lieberman I . The use of gait analysis in the assessment of patients afflicted with spinal disorders. Eur Spine J. 2018; 27(8):1712-1723. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5569-1. View

Kitade I, Nakajima H, Takahashi A, Matsumura M, Shimada S, Kokubo Y . Kinematic, kinetic, and musculoskeletal modeling analysis of gait in patients with cervical myelopathy using a severity classification. Spine J. 2020; 20(7):1096-1105. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.01.014. View

Peebles A, Reinholdt A, Bruetsch A, Lynch S, Huisinga J . Dynamic margin of stability during gait is altered in persons with multiple sclerosis. J Biomech. 2016; 49(16):3949-3955. PMC: 5176013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.11.009. View

Janicki J, Alman B . Scoliosis: Review of diagnosis and treatment. Paediatr Child Health. 2008; 12(9):771-6. PMC: 2532872. DOI: 10.1093/pch/12.9.771. View

Kramers-de Quervain I, Muller R, Stacoff A, Grob D, Stussi E . Gait analysis in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2004; 13(5):449-56. PMC: 3476595. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-003-0588-x. View

Nishida M, Nagura T, Fujita N, Hosogane N, Tsuji T, Nakamura M . Position of the major curve influences asymmetrical trunk kinematics during gait in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Gait Posture. 2016; 51:142-148. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.10.004. View

Ailon T, Shaffrey C, Lenke L, Harrop J, Smith J . Progressive Spinal Kyphosis in the Aging Population. Neurosurgery. 2015; 77 Suppl 4:S164-72. DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000944. View

10.

Barrey C, Roussouly P, Perrin G, Le Huec J . Sagittal balance disorders in severe degenerative spine. Can we identify the compensatory mechanisms?. Eur Spine J. 2011; 20 Suppl 5:626-33. PMC: 3175931. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1930-3. View

11.

Nishimura H, Endo K, Suzuki H, Tanaka H, Shishido T, Yamamoto K . Gait Analysis in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy. Asian Spine J. 2015; 9(3):321-6. PMC: 4472579. DOI: 10.4184/asj.2015.9.3.321. View

12.

Roussouly P, Nnadi C . Sagittal plane deformity: an overview of interpretation and management. Eur Spine J. 2010; 19(11):1824-36. PMC: 2989270. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-010-1476-9. View

13.

Chockalingam N, Dangerfield P, Rahmatalla A, Ahmed E, Cochrane T . Assessment of ground reaction force during scoliotic gait. Eur Spine J. 2004; 13(8):750-4. PMC: 3454054. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-004-0762-9. View

14.

Pataky T . One-dimensional statistical parametric mapping in Python. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2011; 15(3):295-301. DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2010.527837. View

15.

Bess S, Line B, Fu K, McCarthy I, Lafage V, Schwab F . The Health Impact of Symptomatic Adult Spinal Deformity: Comparison of Deformity Types to United States Population Norms and Chronic Diseases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015; 41(3):224-33. PMC: 4718181. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001202. View

16.

Dubost V, Kressig R, Gonthier R, Herrmann F, Aminian K, Najafi B . Relationships between dual-task related changes in stride velocity and stride time variability in healthy older adults. Hum Mov Sci. 2006; 25(3):372-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2006.03.004. View

17.

Gottipati P, Fatone S, Koski T, Sugrue P, Ganju A . Crouch gait in persons with positive sagittal spine alignment resolves with surgery. Gait Posture. 2013; 39(1):372-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.08.012. View

18.

Aebi M . The adult scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2005; 14(10):925-48. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-005-1053-9. View

19.

Yilgor C, Sogunmez N, Boissiere L, Yavuz Y, Obeid I, Kleinstuck F . Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) Score: Development and Validation of a New Method of Analyzing Spinopelvic Alignment to Predict Mechanical Complications After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017; 99(19):1661-1672. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01594. View

20.

Kawkabani G, Saliby R, Mekhael M, Rachkidi R, Massaad A, Ghanem I . Gait kinematic alterations in subjects with adult spinal deformity and their radiological determinants. Gait Posture. 2021; 88:203-209. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.06.003. View