» Articles » PMID: 38289505

Decisional Regret Following Corrective Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: a Single Institution Study of Incidence and Risk Factors

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the characteristics and risk factors for decisional regret following corrective adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery at our hospital.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of a single-surgeon ASD database. Adult patients (> 40 years) who underwent ASD surgery from May 2016 to December 2020 with minimum 2-year follow-up were included (posterior-only, ≥ 4 levels fused to the pelvis) (n = 120). Ottawa decision regret questionnaires, a validated and reliable 5-item Likert scale, were sent to patients postoperatively. Regret scores were defined as (1) low regret: 0-39 (2) medium to high regret: 40-100. Risk factors for medium or high decisional regret were identified using multivariate models.

Results: Ninety patients were successfully contacted and 77 patients consented to participate. Nonparticipants were older, had a higher incidence of anxiety, and higher ASA class. There were 7 patients that reported medium or high decisional regret (9%). Ninety percentage of patients believed that surgery was the right decision, 86% believed that surgery was a wise choice, and 87% would do it again. 8% of patients regretted the surgery and 14% believed that surgery did them harm. 88% of patients felt better after surgery. On multivariate analysis, revision fusion surgery was independently associated with an increased risk of medium or high decisional regret (adjusted odds ratio: 6.000, 95% confidence interval: 1.074-33.534, p = 0.041).

Conclusions: At our institution, we found a 9% incidence of decisional regret. Revision fusion was associated with increased decisional regret. Estimates for decisional regret should be based on single-institution experiences given differences in patient populations.

Citing Articles

Lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: techniques and outcomes.

Bourghli A, Boissiere L, Obeid I N Am Spine Soc J. 2024; 19:100516.

PMID: 39188669 PMC: 11345922. DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100516.

References
1.
Bess S, Line B, Fu K, McCarthy I, Lafage V, Schwab F . The Health Impact of Symptomatic Adult Spinal Deformity: Comparison of Deformity Types to United States Population Norms and Chronic Diseases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015; 41(3):224-33. PMC: 4718181. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001202. View

2.
Carreon L, Glassman S, Lurie J, Shaffrey C, Kelly M, Baldus C . Cost-effectiveness of Operative versus Nonoperative Treatment of Adult Symptomatic Lumbar Scoliosis an Intent-to-treat Analysis at 5-year Follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019; 44(21):1499-1506. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003118. View

3.
Crawford 3rd C, Glassman S, Bridwell K, Berven S, Carreon L . The minimum clinically important difference in SRS-22R total score, appearance, activity and pain domains after surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015; 40(6):377-81. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000761. View

4.
Adogwa O, Elsamadicy A, Vuong V, Fialkoff J, Cheng J, Karikari I . Association between baseline cognitive impairment and postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing surgery for adult spinal deformity. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017; 28(1):103-108. DOI: 10.3171/2017.5.SPINE161244. View

5.
Adogwa O, Elsamadicy A, Sergesketter A, Vuong V, Mehta A, Vasquez R . Prophylactic use of intraoperative vancomycin powder and postoperative infection: an analysis of microbiological patterns in 1200 consecutive surgical cases. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017; 27(3):328-334. DOI: 10.3171/2017.2.SPINE161310. View