» Articles » PMID: 38288450

[Comparison of the Outcome of Orthodontic Dental Movement Using Aligners Versus Fixed Orthodontics: a Review]

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2024 Jan 30
PMID 38288450
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The aligners have become a preferred alternative in terms of orthodontic treatment, surpassing the choice of conventional brackets, due to the comfort and aesthetics that the aligners represent, however, the final result with this system continues to be a controversial issue. The objective of this review was to verify the effectiveness of the treatment completed with aligners versus conventional brackets.

Materials And Methods: An exhaustive search was carried out in the PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus and Embase databases up to the date of January 5, 2023, including comparative studies that evaluated the final result and treatment time of the aligners compared to conventional braces. Two researchers carefully selected the articles evaluated and analyzed different key topics on the subject.

Results: In this study, 8 articles were included, according to the studies, the vast majority did not find significant differences in completion between the compared groups. In addition to this, the treatment time in 3 articles was faster with aligners, in 3 articles it was faster with conventional brackets, and in one article no significant difference was found, so it is not yet established whether a system is faster than the other.

Conclusions: Both aligners and conventional fixed orthodontics had good results at the end of orthodontic treatment and presented a similar treatment time, however, the majority of treated cases belonged to malocclusions of medium to low complexity, so these cannot be generalized. findings to all malocclusions.

Citing Articles

The Critical Influence of Wire Diameter and Bending for Orthodontic Wire Integration-New Insights for Maxillary Movements (In Vitro Study).

Moncher M, Othman A, Schneider B, Fahim F, von See C Dent J (Basel). 2024; 12(12).

PMID: 39727456 PMC: 11674866. DOI: 10.3390/dj12120399.


Perception .

Huayta-Garcia D, Carranza-Samanez K, Dulanto-Vargas J Rev Cient Odontol (Lima). 2024; 12(3):e206.

PMID: 39444719 PMC: 11495169. DOI: 10.21142/2523-2754-1203-2024-206.

References
1.
Garnett B, Mahood K, Nguyen M, Al-Khateeb A, Liu S, Boyd R . Cephalometric comparison of adult anterior open bite treatment using clear aligners and fixed appliances. Angle Orthod. 2018; 89(1):3-9. PMC: 8137127. DOI: 10.2319/010418-4.1. View

2.
Hennessy J, Garvey T, Al-Awadhi E . A randomized clinical trial comparing mandibular incisor proclination produced by fixed labial appliances and clear aligners. Angle Orthod. 2016; 86(5):706-12. PMC: 8600838. DOI: 10.2319/101415-686.1. View

3.
Kuncio D, Maganzini A, Shelton C, Freeman K . Invisalign and traditional orthodontic treatment postretention outcomes compared using the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system. Angle Orthod. 2007; 77(5):864-9. DOI: 10.2319/100106-398.1. View

4.
Christou T, Abarca R, Christou V, Kau C . Smile outcome comparison of Invisalign and traditional fixed-appliance treatment: A case-control study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020; 157(3):357-364. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.03.030. View

5.
Buschang P, Shaw S, Ross M, Crosby D, Campbell P . Comparative time efficiency of aligner therapy and conventional edgewise braces. Angle Orthod. 2014; 84(3):391-6. PMC: 8667515. DOI: 10.2319/062113-466. View