» Articles » PMID: 38286510

Predictability of the Emergency Department Triage System During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Overview
Specialty Emergency Medicine
Date 2024 Jan 29
PMID 38286510
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Emergency department (ED) triage systems are used to classify the severity and urgency of emergency patients, and Korean medical institutions use the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS). During the COVID-19 pandemic, appropriate treatment for emergency patients was delayed due to various circumstances, such as overcrowding of EDs, lack of medical workforce resources, and increased workload on medical staff. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the KTAS in predicting the urgency of emergency patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed patients who were treated in the ED during the pandemic period from January 2020 to June 2021. Patients were divided into COVID-19-screening negative (SN) and COVID-19-screening positive (SP) groups. We compared the predictability of the KTAS for urgent patients between the two groups.

Results: From a total of 107,480 patients, 62,776 patients (58.4%) were included in the SN group and 44,704 (41.6%) were included in the SP group. The odds ratios for severity variables at each KTAS level revealed a more evident discriminatory power of the KTAS for severity variables in the SN group (P<0.001). The predictability of the KTAS for severity variables was higher in the SN group than in the SP group (area under the curve, P<0.001).

Conclusion: During the pandemic, the KTAS had low accuracy in predicting patients in critical condition in the ED. Therefore, in future pandemic periods, supplementation of the current ED triage system should be considered in order to accurately classify the severity of patients.

References
1.
Ng C, Yen Z, Che-Hung Tsai J, Chen L, Lin S, Sang Y . Validation of the Taiwan triage and acuity scale: a new computerised five-level triage system. Emerg Med J. 2010; 28(12):1026-31. DOI: 10.1136/emj.2010.094185. View

2.
FitzGerald G, Jelinek G, Scott D, Gerdtz M . Republished paper: Emergency department triage revisited. Postgrad Med J. 2010; 86(1018):502-8. DOI: 10.1136/pgmj.2009.077081rep. View

3.
Choi D, Hong W, Song K, Kim T, Shin S, Hong K . Modification and Validation of a Complaint-Oriented Emergency Department Triage System: A Multicenter Observational Study. Yonsei Med J. 2021; 62(12):1145-1154. PMC: 8612858. DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2021.62.12.1145. View

4.
Zachariasse J, van der Hagen V, Seiger N, Mackway-Jones K, van Veen M, Moll H . Performance of triage systems in emergency care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2019; 9(5):e026471. PMC: 6549628. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026471. View

5.
Beveridge R, Ducharme J, Janes L, Beaulieu S, Walter S . Reliability of the Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale: interrater agreement. Ann Emerg Med. 1999; 34(2):155-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(99)70223-4. View