» Articles » PMID: 38285190

European Society of Pediatric Radiology Survey of Perioperative Imaging in Pediatric Liver Transplantation: (3) Postoperative Imaging

Abstract

Background: Liver transplantation is the state-of-the-art curative treatment for end-stage liver disease. Imaging is a key element in the detection of postoperative complications. So far, limited data is available regarding the best radiologic approach to monitor children after liver transplantation.

Objective: To harmonize the imaging of pediatric liver transplantation, the European Society of Pediatric Radiology Abdominal Taskforce initiated a survey addressing the current status of imaging including the pre-, intra-, and postoperative phases. This paper reports the responses related to postoperative imaging.

Materials And Methods: An online survey, initiated in 2021, asked European centers performing pediatric liver transplantation 48 questions about their imaging approach. In total, 26 centers were contacted, and 22 institutions from 11 countries returned the survey.

Results: All sites commence ultrasound (US) monitoring within 24 h after liver transplantation. Monitoring frequency varies across sites, ranging from every 8 h to 72 h in early, and from daily to sporadic use in late postoperative phases. Predefined US protocols are used by 73% of sites. This commonly includes gray scale, color Doppler, and quantitative flow assessment. Alternative flow imaging techniques, contrast-enhanced US, and elastography are applied at 31.8%, 18.2%, and 63.6% of sites, respectively. Computed tomography is performed at 86.4% of sites when clarification is needed. Magnetic resonance imaging is used for selected cases at 36.4% of sites, mainly for assessment of biliary abnormalities or when blood tests are abnormal.

Conclusion: Diagnostic imaging is extensively used for postoperative surveillance of children after liver transplantation. While US is generally prioritized, substantial differences were noted in US protocol, timing, and monitoring frequency. The study highlights potential areas for future optimization and standardization of imaging, essential for conducting multicenter studies.

Citing Articles

Evaluation value of contrast enhanced ultrasound quantitative parameters in ischemic-type biliary lesions after liver transplantation-a prospectively study.

Feng Y, Li L, Wen W, Hu X, Qian L, Liu Y Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025; .

PMID: 39862289 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04761-3.


Hepatic Artery Delineation on Ultrasound Volumes Comparing B-Flow and Color Doppler for Postoperative Monitoring of Pediatric Liver Transplants.

Dammann E, Steinmeister L, Groth M, Herden U, Fischer L, Brinkert F Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(6).

PMID: 38535037 PMC: 10968933. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14060617.

References
1.
Franke D, Daugherty R, Kljucevsek D, Ntoulia A, Rafailidis V, Takahashi M . Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of transplant organs - liver and kidney - in children. Pediatr Radiol. 2021; 51(12):2284-2302. PMC: 8865443. DOI: 10.1007/s00247-020-04867-y. View

2.
Yandza T, Gauthier F, Valayer J . Lessons from the first 100 liver transplantations in children at Bicêtre Hospital. J Pediatr Surg. 1994; 29(7):905-11. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3468(94)90013-2. View

3.
Yu C, Chen C, Huang T, Chen T, Tsang L, Ou H . Preoperative imaging evaluation of the hepatic vasculature in biliary atresia patients undergoing LDLT: comparison of MDCT and MRI. Pediatr Transplant. 2008; 13(8):984-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2008.01100.x. View

4.
Hickner B, Anand A, Godfrey E, Dunson J, Reul R, Cotton R . Trends in Survival for Pediatric Transplantation. Pediatrics. 2022; 149(2). DOI: 10.1542/peds.2020-049632. View

5.
Yankol Y, Fernandez L, Kanmaz T, Leverson G, Mezrich J, Foley D . Results of pediatric living donor compared to deceased donor liver transplantation in the PELD/MELD era: Experience from two centers on two different continents. Pediatr Transplant. 2016; 20(1):72-82. DOI: 10.1111/petr.12641. View