» Articles » PMID: 38283749

Process Analysis of the Patient Pathway for Automated Data Collection: an Exemplar Using Pituitary Surgery

Overview
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2024 Jan 29
PMID 38283749
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Automation of routine clinical data shows promise in relieving health systems of the burden associated with manual data collection. Identifying consistent points of documentation in the electronic health record (EHR) provides salient targets to improve data entry quality. Using our pituitary surgery service as an exemplar, we aimed to demonstrate how process mapping can be used to identify reliable areas of documentation in the patient pathway to target structured data entry interventions.

Materials And Methods: This mixed methods study was conducted in the largest pituitary centre in the UK. Purposive snowball sampling identified frontline stakeholders for process mapping to produce a patient pathway. The final patient pathway was subsequently validated against a real-world dataset of 50 patients who underwent surgery for pituitary adenoma. Events were categorized by frequency and mapped to the patient pathway to determine critical data points.

Results: Eighteen stakeholders encompassing all members of the multidisciplinary team (MDT) were consulted for process mapping. The commonest events recorded were neurosurgical ward round entries (N = 212, 14.7%), pituitary clinical nurse specialist (CNS) ward round entries (N = 88, 6.12%) and pituitary MDT treatment decisions (N = 88, 6.12%) representing critical data points. Operation notes and neurosurgical ward round entries were present for every patient. 43/44 (97.7%) had a pre-operative pituitary MDT entry, pre-operative clinic letter, a post-operative clinic letter, an admission clerking entry, a discharge summary, and a post-operative histopathology pituitary multidisciplinary (MDT) team entries.

Conclusion: This is the first study to produce a validated patient pathway of patients undergoing pituitary surgery, serving as a comparison to optimise this patient pathway. We have identified salient targets for structured data entry interventions, including mandatory datapoints seen in every admission and have also identified areas to improve documentation adherence, both of which support movement towards automation.

Citing Articles

Mapping patient education encounters in elective surgery: a cohort study and cross-sectional survey.

Booker J, Penn J, Koh C, Newall N, Rowland D, Sinha S BMJ Open Qual. 2024; 13(2).

PMID: 38802270 PMC: 11131119. DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002810.

References
1.
Brue T, Castinetti F . The risks of overlooking the diagnosis of secreting pituitary adenomas. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2016; 11(1):135. PMC: 5052978. DOI: 10.1186/s13023-016-0516-x. View

2.
Andela C, Lobatto D, Pereira A, van Furth W, Biermasz N . How non-functioning pituitary adenomas can affect health-related quality of life: a conceptual model and literature review. Pituitary. 2018; 21(2):208-216. PMC: 5849670. DOI: 10.1007/s11102-017-0860-4. View

3.
Baker D, Persell S, Thompson J, Soman N, Burgner K, Liss D . Automated review of electronic health records to assess quality of care for outpatients with heart failure. Ann Intern Med. 2007; 146(4):270-7. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-4-200702200-00006. View

4.
Antonacci G, Lennox L, Barlow J, Evans L, Reed J . Process mapping in healthcare: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021; 21(1):342. PMC: 8048073. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06254-1. View

5.
Leon N, Balakrishna Y, Hohlfeld A, Odendaal W, Schmidt B, Zweigenthal V . Routine Health Information System (RHIS) improvements for strengthened health system management. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020; 8:CD012012. PMC: 8094584. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012012.pub2. View