» Articles » PMID: 38283612

Social Processes During Recovery: An Expansion of Kelly and Hoeppner's Biaxial Formulation of Recovery

Overview
Date 2024 Jan 29
PMID 38283612
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recent conceptualizations frame addiction recovery as a complex process involving changes across behavioral, physical, psychological, and social domains. These broad conceptualizations can be difficult to apply directly to research, making detailed models of individual dimensions necessary to guide empirical work and subsequent clinical interventions. We used Kelly and Hoeppner's (2015) biaxial formulation of recovery as a basis for a detailed examination of social processes in recovery using social network approaches. We delineated how appraisal of situational risks and social network resources result in coping actions, and how repeated iterations of this process change a person's social recovery capital over time. In addition, we incorporated the experience of interpersonal trauma and structural oppression, and demonstrated how the model accommodates the complex issues often encountered during recovery. We present a measurable framework that can guide empirical testing of how social processes and social recovery capital change over time during recovery. The model presented here illuminates key factors in the recovery process that have the potential to support trauma- and social-network-informed interventions. We call for research that empirically tests this model in ways that will result in practical, trauma-informed social network interventions for people in recovery.

Citing Articles

Agreement for Recovery: First Spanish Consensus on the Concept of Alcohol Addiction Recovery.

Esteban-Rodriguez L, Perez-Lopez M, Sion A, Olmos-Espinosa R, Jurado-Barba R, Maldonado-Sanchez D Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2024; 52(4):382-393.

PMID: 39129690 PMC: 11319745. DOI: 10.62641/aep.v52i4.1633.


Gradual improvement in functioning and mental distress during long-term outpatient SUD treatment - A prospective pre-post study.

Gabrielsen K, Clausen T, Haugland S, Vederhus J Addict Behav Rep. 2024; 19:100525.

PMID: 38273991 PMC: 10808902. DOI: 10.1016/j.abrep.2024.100525.

References
1.
Stone A, Jason L, Light J, Stevens E . The Role of Ego Networks in Studies of Substance Use Disorder Recovery. Alcohol Treat Q. 2016; 34(3):315-328. PMC: 5004735. DOI: 10.1080/07347324.2016.1182818. View

2.
Valente T, Gallaher P, Mouttapa M . Using social networks to understand and prevent substance use: a transdisciplinary perspective. Subst Use Misuse. 2004; 39(10-12):1685-712. DOI: 10.1081/ja-200033210. View

3.
Belfrage A, Nja A, Lunde S, Arstad J, Fodstad E, Lid T . Traumatic experiences and PTSD symptoms in substance use disorder: A comparison of recovered versus current users. Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2023; 40(1):61-75. PMC: 9893129. DOI: 10.1177/14550725221122222. View

4.
Porcaro A, Nguyen R, Salomon-Amend M, Chaparro J, Jason L . Developing a Latent Coping Resources Factor for Recovery from Substance Use Disorder. Addict Res Theory. 2021; 29(3):239-246. PMC: 8133534. DOI: 10.1080/16066359.2020.1807959. View

5.
Jurinsky J, Cowie K, Blyth S, Hennessy E . "A lot better than it used to be": A qualitative study of adolescents' dynamic social recovery capital. Addict Res Theory. 2023; 31(2):77-83. PMC: 10062693. DOI: 10.1080/16066359.2022.2114076. View