» Articles » PMID: 38283539

Association Between Area Deprivation Index and Concerns to COVID-19: A Multi-level Analysis of Individual and Area Factors

Overview
Date 2024 Jan 29
PMID 38283539
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been one of the most serious global threats to public health recently. The present study examined whether area deprivation is associated with concerns related to COVID-19 using large nationwide data across South Korea.

Methods: We used nationwide 2020 Korea Community Health Survey and official government database. Of the 225,680 included participants, 123,324 (54.6%) were women, and the mean age was 54.9 [17.8] years old. We classified the Area deprivation index (ADI) into Quartile 1 (Least deprived); Quartile 2; Quartile 3; and Quartile 4 (Most deprived). Our primary outcome was the concerns related to COVID-19 (0-16 scores). Multilevel regression analysis was conducted.

Results: The mean score of concerns related to COVID-19 was 11.3 [3.2] in the total population. 13.5% of the variability in the scores of concerns related to COVID-19 was accounted for by district areas. Area with Q4 of ADI were associated with an increased score of concerns related to COVID-19 (Q1: reference; Q2:  = 0.218,  = 0.119 = ; Q3:  = 0.235,  = 0.133, = ; Q4:  = 0.252,  = 0.109, = ). 19-49 groups in area with Q4 of ADI were associated with an increase in scores of concerns related to COVID-19 than other age groups in area with Q4 of ADI. Area with Q4 of ADI were associated with a score of concern of being criticized if getting infected compared to area with Q1 of ADI.

Conclusion: We found that the highest quartile ADI was associated with greater concerns related to COVID-19. By identifying vulnerable population to concerns related to COVID-19, health systems may consider preventive intervention to mitigate mental health issues.

Citing Articles

A comparative analysis of COVID-19 seroprevalence rates, observed infection rates, and infection-related mortality.

Ford E, Patel K, Baus H, Valenti S, Croker J, Kimberly R Front Public Health. 2025; 13:1504524.

PMID: 39980922 PMC: 11841498. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1504524.

References
1.
Lu X, Lin Z . COVID-19, Economic Impact, Mental Health, and Coping Behaviors: A Conceptual Framework and Future Research Directions. Front Psychol. 2021; 12:759974. PMC: 8660126. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.759974. View

2.
Cullen W, Gulati G, Kelly B . Mental health in the COVID-19 pandemic. QJM. 2020; 113(5):311-312. PMC: 7184387. DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcaa110. View

3.
Jarman B, Townsend P, Carstairs V . Deprivation indices. BMJ. 1991; 303(6801):523. PMC: 1670803. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.303.6801.523-a. View

4.
Hubbard G, den Daas C, Johnston M, Dixon D . Sociodemographic and Psychological Risk Factors for Anxiety and Depression: Findings from the Covid-19 Health and Adherence Research in Scotland on Mental Health (CHARIS-MH) Cross-sectional Survey. Int J Behav Med. 2021; 28(6):788-800. PMC: 7929550. DOI: 10.1007/s12529-021-09967-z. View

5.
Lee S, Yeon M, Kim C, Yoon T . The Association Among Individual and Contextual Factors and Unmet Healthcare Needs in South Korea: A Multilevel Study Using National Data. J Prev Med Public Health. 2016; 49(5):308-322. PMC: 5066417. DOI: 10.3961/jpmph.16.035. View