» Articles » PMID: 38283057

Assessing Health-Related Quality of Life in Non-Directed Versus Directed Kidney Donors: Implications for the Promotion of Non-Directed Donation

Overview
Journal Transpl Int
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2024 Jan 29
PMID 38283057
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Living kidney donation has increased significantly, but little is known about the post-donation health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of non-directed donors (NDs) vs. directed donors (DDs). We thus examined the outcomes of 112 living kidney donors (82 NDs, 30 DDs). For the primary outcomes-namely, the mean physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores of the 12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12) questionnaire-scores were significantly higher for the NDs vs. the DDs (PCS: +2.69, MCS: +4.43). For secondary outcomes, NDs had shorter hospital stays (3.4 vs. 4.4 days), returned to physical activity earlier (45 vs. 60 days), exercised more before and after donation, and continued physical activity post-donation. Regression analyses revealed that donor type and white blood cell count were predictive of the PCS-12 score, and donor type was predictive of the MCS-12 score. Non-directed donation was predictive of a shorter hospital stay (by 0.78 days, < 0.001) and the odds of having PCS-12 and MCS-12 scores above 50 were almost 10 and 16 times higher for NDs, respectively ( < 0.05). These findings indicate the safety and potential benefits of promoting non-directed donation. However, careful selection processes must be maintained to prevent harm and exploitation.

Citing Articles

Quality of Life of Donors After Living Kidney Transplantation: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Skalioti C, Smyrli M, Beletsioti C, Tsiakas S, Vallianou K, Boletis J Life (Basel). 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 40003733 PMC: 11857444. DOI: 10.3390/life15020325.


Basiliximab induction alone vs a dual ATG-basiliximab approach in first live-donor non-sensitized kidney transplant recipients with low HLA matching.

Hod T, Levinger S, Askenasy E, Siman-Tov M, Davidov Y, Ghinea R Clin Kidney J. 2024; 17(9):sfae236.

PMID: 39314868 PMC: 11418037. DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfae236.

References
1.
Meier-Kriesche H, Kaplan B . Waiting time on dialysis as the strongest modifiable risk factor for renal transplant outcomes: a paired donor kidney analysis. Transplantation. 2002; 74(10):1377-81. DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200211270-00005. View

2.
Sadler H, Davison L, Carroll C, Kountz S . The living, genetically unrelated, kidney donor. Semin Psychiatry. 1971; 3(1):86-101. View

3.
Timmerman L, Zuidema W, Erdman R, Kranenburg L, Timman R, IJzermans J . Psychologic functioning of unspecified anonymous living kidney donors before and after donation. Transplantation. 2013; 95(11):1369-74. DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31828eaf81. View

4.
Rodrigue J, Pavlakis M, Danovitch G, Johnson S, Karp S, Khwaja K . Evaluating living kidney donors: relationship types, psychosocial criteria, and consent processes at US transplant programs. Am J Transplant. 2007; 7(10):2326-32. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.01921.x. View

5.
Roodnat J, Zuidema W, van de Wetering J, De Klerk M, Erdman R, Massey E . Altruistic donor triggered domino-paired kidney donation for unsuccessful couples from the kidney-exchange program. Am J Transplant. 2010; 10(4):821-827. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03034.x. View