» Articles » PMID: 38279184

Preventing Respiratory Viral Illness Invisibly (PRiVII): Protocol for a Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trial Evaluating Far-UVC Light Devices in Long-term Care Facilities to Reduce Infections

Abstract

Background: Respiratory viral illness (RVI)-e.g., influenza, COVID-19-is a serious threat in long-term care (LTC) facilities. Standard infection control measures are suboptimal in LTC facilities because of residents' cognitive impairments, care needs, and susceptibility to loneliness and mental illness. Further, LTC residents living with high degrees of frailty who contract RVIs often develop the so-called atypical symptoms (e.g., delirium, worse mobility) instead of typical cough and fever, delaying infection diagnosis and treatment. Although far-UVC (222 nm) light devices have shown potent antiviral activity in vitro, clinical efficacy remains unproven.

Methods: Following a study to assay acceptability at each site, this multicenter, double-blinded, cluster-randomized, placebo-controlled trial aims to assess whether far-UVC light devices impact the incidence of RVIs in LTC facilities. Neighborhoods within LTC facilities are randomized to receive far-UVC light devices (222 nm) or identical placebo light devices that emit only visible spectrum light (400-700 nm) in common areas. All residents are monitored for RVIs using both a standard screening protocol and a novel screening protocol that target atypical symptoms. The 3-year incidence of RVIs will be compared using intention-to-treat analysis. A cost-consequence analysis will follow.

Discussion: This trial aims to inform decisions about whether to implement far-UVC light in LTC facilities for RVI prevention. The trial design features align with this pragmatic intent. Appropriate additional ethical protections have been implemented to mitigate participant vulnerabilities that arise from conducting this study. Knowledge dissemination will be supported through media engagement, peer-reviewed presentations, and publications.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05084898. October 20, 2021.

Citing Articles

Are pragmatism and ethical protections in clinical trials a zero-sum game?.

Nix H, Weijer C, Taljaard M Clin Trials. 2024; 22(1):109-115.

PMID: 39410779 PMC: 11809111. DOI: 10.1177/17407745241284798.

References
1.
Searle S, Rockwood K . Does determining the degree of frailty help pandemic decision-making when resources are scarce?. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2021; 2(3):e119-e120. PMC: 8009757. DOI: 10.1016/S2666-7568(21)00030-1. View

2.
Nix H, Largent E, Taljaard M, Mitchell S, Weijer C . Ethical analysis of vulnerabilities in cluster randomized trials involving people living with dementia in long-term care homes. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022; 71(2):588-598. PMC: 9957897. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18128. View

3.
Sands M, Sharma S, Carpenter L, Hartshorn A, Lee J, Lujic S . "SQiD, the Single Question in Delirium; can a single question help clinicians to detect delirium in hospitalised cancer patients?" running heading Single Question in Delirium" (Bcan-D-20-01665). BMC Cancer. 2021; 21(1):75. PMC: 7814717. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07504-x. View

4.
Hubbard R, Maier A, Hilmer S, Naganathan V, Etherton-Beer C, Rockwood K . Frailty in the face of COVID-19. Age Ageing. 2020; 49(4):499-500. PMC: 7239250. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afaa095. View

5.
Buonanno M, Ponnaiya B, Welch D, Stanislauskas M, Randers-Pehrson G, Smilenov L . Germicidal Efficacy and Mammalian Skin Safety of 222-nm UV Light. Radiat Res. 2017; 187(4):483-491. PMC: 5552051. DOI: 10.1667/RR0010CC.1. View