» Articles » PMID: 38275541

Aligning Cancer Research Priorities in Europe with Recommendations for Conquering Cancer: A Comprehensive Analysis

Abstract

Improvements in cancer care require a new degree of collaboration beyond the purely medical sphere, extending deeply into the world of other stakeholders-preeminently patients but also the other stakeholders in the hardware and software of care. Cancer remains a global health challenge, necessitating collaborative efforts to understand, prevent, and treat this complex disease. To achieve this goal, a comprehensive analysis was conducted, aligning the prioritization of cancer research measures in 13 European countries with 13 key recommendations for conquering cancer in the region. The study utilized a survey involving both patients and citizens, alongside data from IQVIA, a global healthcare data provider, to assess the availability and access to single-biomarker tests in multiple European countries. The results revealed a focused approach toward understanding, preventing, and treating cancer, with each country emphasizing specific research measures tailored to its strengths and healthcare objectives. This analysis highlights the intricate relationship between research priorities, access to biomarker tests, and financial support. Timely access to tests and increased availability positively influence research areas such as cancer prevention, early detection, ageing, and data utilization. The alignment of these country-specific measures with 13 recommendations for conquering cancer in Europe underscores the importance of tailored strategies for understanding, preventing, and treating cancer.

Citing Articles

Advancements and Challenges in the Image-Based Diagnosis of Lung and Colon Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.

Patharia P, Sethy P, Nanthaamornphong A Cancer Inform. 2024; 23:11769351241290608.

PMID: 39483315 PMC: 11526153. DOI: 10.1177/11769351241290608.


Standardization through education of molecular pathology: a spotlight on the European Masters in Molecular Pathology.

Ilie M, Lake V, de Alava E, Bonin S, Chlebowski S, Delort A Virchows Arch. 2024; 485(5):761-775.

PMID: 39354109 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-024-03933-2.

References
1.
Grill C . Involving stakeholders in research priority setting: a scoping review. Res Involv Engagem. 2021; 7(1):75. PMC: 8555197. DOI: 10.1186/s40900-021-00318-6. View

2.
Mukaka M . Statistics corner: A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med J. 2013; 24(3):69-71. PMC: 3576830. View

3.
Brtnikova M, Studts J, Robertson E, Dickinson L, Carroll J, Krist A . Priorities for improvement across cancer and non-cancer related preventive services among rural and non-rural clinicians. BMC Prim Care. 2022; 23(1):231. PMC: 9462636. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-022-01845-1. View

4.
Murphy K, Levis M, Hafez M, Geiger T, Cooper L, Smith B . Detection of FLT3 internal tandem duplication and D835 mutations by a multiplex polymerase chain reaction and capillary electrophoresis assay. J Mol Diagn. 2003; 5(2):96-102. PMC: 1907323. DOI: 10.1016/S1525-1578(10)60458-8. View

5.
Terry R, Charles E, Purdy B, Sanford A . An analysis of research priority-setting at the World Health Organization - how mapping to a standard template allows for comparison between research priority-setting approaches. Health Res Policy Syst. 2018; 16(1):116. PMC: 6264050. DOI: 10.1186/s12961-018-0391-0. View