» Articles » PMID: 38273830

Comparative Efficiency and Safety of Potassium Competitive Acid Blockers Lansoprazole in Peptic Ulcer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Front Pharmacol
Date 2024 Jan 26
PMID 38273830
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Lansoprazole, a proton-pump inhibitor (PPI), is the primary therapy for peptic ulcers (PU). Potassium competitive acid blockers (P-CAB) offer an alternative for acid suppression. However, the efficacy and safety of P-CABs lansoprazole in the management of PU has not been evaluated. Five databases were searched for randomized clinical trials in English until 31 August 2023. Data extraction provided outcome counts for ulcer healing, recurrent NSAID-related ulcer, and adverse events. The pooled effect, presented as rate difference (RD), was stratified by ulcer location, follow-up time, and the types of P-CAB, along with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The pooled healing rates of peptic ulcers were 95.3% (1,100/1,154) and 95.0% (945/995) for P-CABs and lansoprazole, respectively (RD: 0.4%, 95% CI: -1.4%-2.3%). The lower bounds of the 95% CI fell within the predefined non-inferiority margin of -6%. In subgroup analyses base on ulcer location, and follow-up time also demonstrated non-inferiority. The drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) did not differ significantly among groups (RR: 0.997, 95% CI: 0.949-1.046, = 0.893). However, P-CAB treatment was associated with an increased risk of the serious adverse events compared to lansoprazole (RR: 1.325, 95% CI: 1.005-1.747, = 0.046). P-CABs demonstrated non-inferiority to lansoprazole in the management of peptic ulcer. The safety and tolerability profile are comparable, with similar TEAEs rates. However, P-CABs appear to have a higher risk of serious adverse events. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=458361 Identifier: PROSPERO (No. CRD42023458361).

Citing Articles

So Many Choices, So Little Value: Potential Savings from Selecting Cost-Effective Proton Pump Inhibitors.

Kwon H Pharmacoecon Open. 2025; .

PMID: 39948220 DOI: 10.1007/s41669-025-00563-5.


Risks of anti- therapy and long-term therapy with antisecretory drugs.

Kotelevets S World J Gastroenterol. 2025; 31(4):101933.

PMID: 39877710 PMC: 11718649. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i4.101933.


Vonoprazan vs. Proton Pump Inhibitors for Treatment and Prevention of Gastric and/or Duodenal Ulcers: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Simadibrata D, Lesmana E, Pratama M, Sugiharta A, Kalaij A, Fadhilla A Dig Dis Sci. 2024; 69(10):3863-3874.

PMID: 39294424 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-024-08593-5.


Comparison of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers and Proton Pump Inhibitors in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Agago D, Hanif N, Ajay Kumar A, Arsalan M, Kaur Dhanjal M, Hanif L Cureus. 2024; 16(7):e65141.

PMID: 39176368 PMC: 11338695. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.65141.


Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers vs. Proton Pump Inhibitors for Peptic Ulcer with or without Infection: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Ouyang M, Zou S, Cheng Q, Shi X, Zhao Y, Sun M Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024; 17(6).

PMID: 38931366 PMC: 11206580. DOI: 10.3390/ph17060698.

References
1.
Yu E, Bauer S, Bain P, Bauer D . Proton pump inhibitors and risk of fractures: a meta-analysis of 11 international studies. Am J Med. 2011; 124(6):519-26. PMC: 3101476. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.01.007. View

2.
Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Hoffmann T, Mulrow C . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372:n71. PMC: 8005924. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71. View

3.
SAKITA T, OGURO Y, Takasu S, Fukutomi H, Miwa T . Observations on the healing of ulcerations in early gastric cancer. The life cycle of the malignant ulcer. Gastroenterology. 1971; 60(5):835-9 passim. View

4.
Kagami T, Sahara S, Ichikawa H, Uotani T, Yamade M, Sugimoto M . Potent acid inhibition by vonoprazan in comparison with esomeprazole, with reference to CYP2C19 genotype. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016; 43(10):1048-59. DOI: 10.1111/apt.13588. View

5.
Cumpston M, Li T, Page M, Chandler J, Welch V, Higgins J . Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; 10:ED000142. PMC: 10284251. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.ED000142. View