» Articles » PMID: 38268795

A Reinforcement Learning Model with Choice Traces for a Progressive Ratio Schedule

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2024 Jan 25
PMID 38268795
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The progressive ratio (PR) lever-press task serves as a benchmark for assessing goal-oriented motivation. However, a well-recognized limitation of the PR task is that only a single data point, known as the breakpoint, is obtained from an entire session as a barometer of motivation. Because the breakpoint is defined as the final ratio of responses achieved in a PR session, variations in choice behavior during the PR task cannot be captured. We addressed this limitation by constructing four reinforcement learning models: a simple Q-learning model, an asymmetric model with two learning rates, a perseverance model with choice traces, and a perseverance model without learning. These models incorporated three behavioral choices: reinforced and non-reinforced lever presses and void magazine nosepokes, because we noticed that male mice performed frequent magazine nosepokes during PR tasks. The best model was the perseverance model, which predicted a gradual reduction in amplitudes of reward prediction errors (RPEs) upon void magazine nosepokes. We confirmed the prediction experimentally with fiber photometry of extracellular dopamine (DA) dynamics in the ventral striatum of male mice using a fluorescent protein (genetically encoded GPCR activation-based DA sensor: GRAB). We verified application of the model by acute intraperitoneal injection of low-dose methamphetamine (METH) before a PR task, which increased the frequency of magazine nosepokes during the PR session without changing the breakpoint. The perseverance model captured behavioral modulation as a result of increased initial action values, which are customarily set to zero and disregarded in reinforcement learning analysis. Our findings suggest that the perseverance model reveals the effects of psychoactive drugs on choice behaviors during PR tasks.

Citing Articles

Distinct sex differences in ethanol consumption and operant self-administration in C57BL/6J mice with uniform regulation by glutamate AMPAR activity.

Faccidomo S, Eastman V, Santanam T, Swaim K, Taylor S, Hodge C Front Behav Neurosci. 2025; 18:1498201.

PMID: 39911242 PMC: 11794300. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2024.1498201.


Active reinforcement learning versus action bias and hysteresis: control with a mixture of experts and nonexperts.

Colas J, ODoherty J, Grafton S PLoS Comput Biol. 2024; 20(3):e1011950.

PMID: 38552190 PMC: 10980507. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011950.

References
1.
Tsutsui-Kimura I, Takiue H, Yoshida K, Xu M, Yano R, Ohta H . Dysfunction of ventrolateral striatal dopamine receptor type 2-expressing medium spiny neurons impairs instrumental motivation. Nat Commun. 2017; 8:14304. PMC: 5296642. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14304. View

2.
Kelley A . Measurement of rodent stereotyped behavior. Curr Protoc Neurosci. 2008; Chapter 8:Unit 8.8. DOI: 10.1002/0471142301.ns0808s04. View

3.
Tsutsui-Kimura I, Natsubori A, Mori M, Kobayashi K, Drew M, de Kerchove dExaerde A . Distinct Roles of Ventromedial versus Ventrolateral Striatal Medium Spiny Neurons in Reward-Oriented Behavior. Curr Biol. 2017; 27(19):3042-3048.e4. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.08.061. View

4.
Bernacer J, Corlett P, Ramachandra P, McFarlane B, Turner D, Clark L . Methamphetamine-induced disruption of frontostriatal reward learning signals: relation to psychotic symptoms. Am J Psychiatry. 2013; 170(11):1326-34. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12070978. View

5.
Bradshaw C, Killeen P . A theory of behaviour on progressive ratio schedules, with applications in behavioural pharmacology. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012; 222(4):549-64. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-012-2771-4. View