Identification of and Related Decoction Pieces: a Data Fusion Method Combining Electronic Nose, Electronic Tongue, Electronic Eye, and High-performance Liquid Chromatography Data
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
We here describe a new method for distinguishing authentic from similar decoctions (namely, , , and ). Preliminary identification and analysis of four types of decoction pieces were conducted following the and local standards. Intelligent sensory data were then collected using an electronic nose, an electronic tongue, and an electronic eye, and chromatography data were obtained via high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), support vector machines (SVM), and back propagation neural network (BP-NN) models were built using each set of single-source data for authenticity identification (binary classification of vs. other samples) and for species determination (multi-class sample identification). Features were extracted from all datasets using an unsupervised approach [principal component analysis (PCA)] and a supervised approach (PLS-DA). Mid-level data fusion was then used to combine features from the four datasets and the effects of feature extraction methods on model performance were compared. Gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry (GC-IMS) showed significant differences in the types and abundances of volatile organic compounds between the four sample types. In authenticity determination, the PLS-DA and SVM models based on fused latent variables (LVs) performed the best, with 100% accuracy in both the calibration and validation sets. In species identification, the PLS-DA model built with fused principal components (PCs) or fused LVs had the best performance, with 100% accuracy in the calibration set and just one misclassification in the validation set. In the PLS-DA and SVM authenticity identification models, fused LVs performed better than fused PCs. Model analysis was used to identify PCs that strongly contributed to accurate sample classification, and a PC factor loading matrix was used to assess the correlation between PCs and the original variables. This study serves as a reference for future efforts to accurately evaluate the quality of Chinese medicine decoction pieces, promoting medicinal formulation safety.
Advances in the Identification Methods of Food-Medicine Homologous Herbal Materials.
Jiang Y, Wei S, Ge H, Zhang Y, Wang H, Wen X Foods. 2025; 14(4).
PMID: 40002052 PMC: 11853841. DOI: 10.3390/foods14040608.
Quality identification of using E-nose, HS-GC-IMS, and intelligent data fusion methods.
Zhang P, Gui X, Fan X, Han-Li , Li H, Li X Front Chem. 2025; 13:1544743.
PMID: 39981266 PMC: 11840568. DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2025.1544743.
Huang Y, Luo W, Pei W, Sun D, Zhou H, He F Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1496789.
PMID: 39574447 PMC: 11578696. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1496789.
Wang B, Liu K, Wei G, He A, Kong W, Zhang X Biosensors (Basel). 2024; 14(10).
PMID: 39451681 PMC: 11506179. DOI: 10.3390/bios14100468.