» Articles » PMID: 38267633

Endometriosis MR Mimickers: T2-hypointense Lesions

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Radiology
Date 2024 Jan 24
PMID 38267633
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Endometriosis is a common crippling disease in women of reproductive age. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered the cornerstone radiological technique for both the diagnosis and management of endometriosis. While its sensitivity, especially in deep infiltrating endometriosis, is superior to that of ultrasonography, many sources of false-positive results exist, leading to a lack of specificity. Hypointense lesions or pseudo-lesions on T2-weighted images include anatomical variants, fibrous connective tissues, benign and malignant tumors, feces, surgical materials, and post treatment scars which may mimic deep pelvic infiltrating endometriosis. False positives can have a major impact on patient management, from diagnosis to medical or surgical treatment. This educational review aims to help the radiologist acknowledge MRI criteria, pitfalls, and the differential diagnosis of deep pelvic infiltrating endometriosis to reduce false-positive results. Critical relevance statement MRI in deep infiltrating endometriosis has a 23% false-positive rate, leading to misdiagnosis. T2-hypointense lesions primarily result from anatomical variations, fibrous connective tissue, benign and malignant tumors, feces, surgical material, and post-treatment scars. Key points • MRI in DIE has a 23% false-positive rate, leading to potential misdiagnosis.• Anatomical variations, fibrous connective tissues, neoplasms, and surgical alterations are the main sources of T2-hypointense mimickers.• Multisequence interpretation, morphologic assessment, and precise anatomic localization are crucial to prevent overdiagnosis.• Gadolinium injection is beneficial for assessing endometriosis differential diagnosis only in specific conditions.

Citing Articles

Targeted nanoparticles for imaging and therapy of endometriosis†.

Slayden O, Luo F, Park Y, Moses A, Demessie A, Singh P Biol Reprod. 2024; 110(6):1191-1200.

PMID: 38738758 PMC: 11180615. DOI: 10.1093/biolre/ioae073.


Correction: Endometriosis MR mimickers: T2-hypointense lesions.

Ruaux E, VanBuren W, Nougaret S, Gavrel M, Charlot M, Grangeon F Insights Imaging. 2024; 15(1):89.

PMID: 38526611 PMC: 10963703. DOI: 10.1186/s13244-024-01674-z.

References
1.
Bazot M, Kermarrec E, Bendifallah S, Darai E . MRI of intestinal endometriosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020; 71:51-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.05.013. View

2.
Khashper A, Addley H, Abourokbah N, Nougaret S, Sala E, Reinhold C . T2-hypointense adnexal lesions: an imaging algorithm. Radiographics. 2012; 32(4):1047-64. DOI: 10.1148/rg.324115180. View

3.
Rosa F, Martinetti C, Piscopo F, Buccicardi D, Schettini D, Neumaier C . Multimodality imaging features of desmoid tumors: a head-to-toe spectrum. Insights Imaging. 2020; 11(1):103. PMC: 7520866. DOI: 10.1186/s13244-020-00908-0. View

4.
Heo S, Shin S, Kim J, Lim H, Seon H, Jung S . Imaging of actinomycosis in various organs: a comprehensive review. Radiographics. 2014; 34(1):19-33. DOI: 10.1148/rg.341135077. View

5.
Busard M, Pieters-van den Bos I, Mijatovic V, van Kuijk C, Bleeker M, van Waesberghe J . Evaluation of MR diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating endometriosis infiltrating the bowel from colorectal carcinoma. Eur J Radiol. 2011; 81(6):1376-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.03.038. View