» Articles » PMID: 38266300

Mass Drug Administration: Contextual Factor Considerations

Overview
Specialty Tropical Medicine
Date 2024 Jan 24
PMID 38266300
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In designing mass drug administration (MDA) campaigns, it is imperative to consider contextual factors that affect uptake of the intervention, including acceptability, cost, feasibility, and health system considerations, to ensure optimal coverage. We reviewed the literature on contextual factors influencing MDA delivery to provide programs with information to design a successful campaign. From 1,044 articles screened, 37 included contextual factors relevant to participants' values and preferences, drivers of MDA acceptability, health equity concerns, financial and economic aspects, and feasibility barriers; 13 included relevant modeling data. Key findings were abstracted by two reviewers and summarized. No studies directly assessed values or direct health equity concerns with respect to MDA, which represents an evidence gap as unequal distributions of effects and factors that impact participant acceptability and program feasibility must be considered to ensure equitable access. Participant acceptability was the most widely surveyed factor, appearing in 28 of 37 studies; perceived adverse events were a frequently noted cause of nonparticipation, mentioned in 15 studies. Feasibility considerations included when, where, and how drugs will be delivered and how to address pregnant women, as these can all have substantial implications for participation. Mass drug administration costs (∼$1.04 to $19.40 per person per round) are driven primarily by drug prices, but the delivery mechanism can have varying costs as well, and integration with other interventions may provide cost savings. Both programmatic goals and sociopolitical and economic contexts must be carefully considered before embarking on an MDA program to ensure programmatic success.

References
1.
. MALARIA control and eradication in Taiwan: progress report, May 1952 50 June 1957. Bull World Health Organ. 1958; 19(4):595-620. PMC: 2537726. View

2.
Adhikari B, Phommasone K, Pongvongsa T, Soundala X, Koummarasy P, Henriques G . Perceptions of asymptomatic malaria infection and their implications for malaria control and elimination in Laos. PLoS One. 2018; 13(12):e0208912. PMC: 6289463. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208912. View

3.
Kaehler N, Adhikari B, Cheah P, Day N, Paris D, Tanner M . The promise, problems and pitfalls of mass drug administration for malaria elimination: a qualitative study with scientists and policymakers. Int Health. 2018; 11(3):166-176. PMC: 6484636. DOI: 10.1093/inthealth/ihy079. View

4.
Jones S . Mass treatment with pyrimethamine; a study of resistance and cross resistance resulting from a field trial in the hyperendemic malarious area of Makueni, Kenya. September 1952-September 1953. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1958; 52(6):547-61. DOI: 10.1016/0035-9203(58)90104-4. View

5.
Robinson L, Wampfler R, Betuela I, Karl S, White M, Li Wai Suen C . Strategies for understanding and reducing the Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium ovale hypnozoite reservoir in Papua New Guinean children: a randomised placebo-controlled trial and mathematical model. PLoS Med. 2015; 12(10):e1001891. PMC: 4624431. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001891. View