» Articles » PMID: 38265635

Building Capacity for Research on Community Doula Care: A Stakeholder-Engaged Process in California

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2024 Jan 24
PMID 38265635
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: In an effort to address persistent inequities in maternal and infant health, policymakers and advocates have pushed to expand access to doula care. Several states, including California, now cover doula services through Medicaid. As coverage expands, research on the impact of doula care will likely increase. To develop best practices for research, it is critical to engage community doulas, clients, and other key stakeholders.

Description: Our overarching goal was to build capacity for future doula- and client-centered research on community doula care. First, we established a Steering Committee with members from seven relevant stakeholder groups: community doulas, former or potential doula clients, clinicians, payers, advocates, researchers, and public health professionals. Second, we conducted a needs assessment to identify and understand stakeholders' needs and values for research on community doula care. Findings from the needs assessment informed our third step, conducting a research prioritization to develop a shared research agenda related to community doula care with the Steering Committee. We adapted the Research Prioritization by Affected Communities protocol to guide this process, which resulted in a final list of 21 priority research questions. Lastly, we offered a training to increase capacity among community doulas to engage in research on community doula care.

Assessment: Our findings provide direction for those interested in conducting research on doula care, as well as policymakers and funders.

Conclusion: The findings of our stakeholder-engaged process provide a roadmap that will lead to equity-oriented research centering clients, doulas, and their communities.

Citing Articles

Access to perinatal doula services in Medicaid: a case analysis of 2 states.

Safon C, McCloskey L, Estela M, Gordon S, Cole M, Clark J Health Aff Sch. 2024; 2(3):qxae023.

PMID: 38756922 PMC: 10986220. DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxae023.

References
1.
Sox H . Defining comparative effectiveness research: the importance of getting it right. Med Care. 2010; 48(6 Suppl):S7-8. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181da3709. View

2.
Carter N, Bryant-Lukosius D, DiCenso A, Blythe J, Neville A . The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014; 41(5):545-7. DOI: 10.1188/14.ONF.545-547. View

3.
van Eijk M, Guenther G, Kett P, Jopson A, Frogner B, Skillman S . Addressing Systemic Racism in Birth Doula Services to Reduce Health Inequities in the United States. Health Equity. 2022; 6(1):98-105. PMC: 8896213. DOI: 10.1089/heq.2021.0033. View

4.
Thomas M, Ammann G, Brazier E, Noyes P, Maybank A . Doula Services Within a Healthy Start Program: Increasing Access for an Underserved Population. Matern Child Health J. 2017; 21(Suppl 1):59-64. PMC: 5736765. DOI: 10.1007/s10995-017-2402-0. View

5.
Kozhimannil K, Hardeman R, Attanasio L, Blauer-Peterson C, OBrien M . Doula care, birth outcomes, and costs among Medicaid beneficiaries. Am J Public Health. 2013; 103(4):e113-21. PMC: 3617571. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301201. View