» Articles » PMID: 38265569

Real-world Use of Multigene Signatures in Early Breast Cancer: Differences to Clinical Trials

Abstract

Purpose: In Italy, Lombardy was the first region to reimburse multigene assays (MGAs) for patients otherwise candidates for chemotherapy. This is a real-world experience of MGAs usage in six referral cancer centers in Lombardy.

Methods: Among MGAs, Oncotype DX (RS) was used in 97% of cases. Consecutive patients tested with Oncotype DX from July 2020 to July 2022 were selected. The distribution of clinicopathologic features by RS groups (low RS: 0-25, high RS: 26-100) was assessed using chi-square and compared with those of the TAILORx and RxPONDER trials.

Results: Out of 1,098 patients identified, 73% had low RS. Grade and Ki67 were associated with RS (p < 0.001). In patients with both G3 and Ki67 > 30%, 39% had low RS, while in patients with both G1 and Ki67 < 20%, 7% had high RS. The proportion of low RS in node-positive patients was similar to that in RxPONDER (82% vs 83%), while node-negative patients with low RS were significantly less than in TAILORx (66% vs 86%, p < 0.001). The distribution of Grade was different from registration trials, with more G3 and fewer G1 (38% and 3%) than in TAILORx (18% and 27%) and RxPONDER (10% and 24%) (p < 0.001). Patients ≤ 50 years were overrepresented in this series (41%) than in TAILORx and RxPONDER (31% and 24%, respectively) (p < 0.001) and, among them, 42% were node positive.

Conclusions: In this real-world series, Oncotype DX was the test almost exclusively used. Despite reimbursement being linked to pre-test chemotherapy recommendation, almost 3/4 patients resulted in the low-RS group. The significant proportion of node-positive patients ≤ 50 years tested indicates that oncologists considered Oncotype DX informative also in this population.

Citing Articles

The Evolving Role of Genomic Testing in Early Breast Cancer: Implications for Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Therapy.

Venetis K, Pescia C, Cursano G, Frascarelli C, Mane E, De Camilli E Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(11).

PMID: 38891906 PMC: 11172282. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25115717.

References
1.
Licata L, Cosentini D, De Sanctis R, Iorfida M, Rota Caremoli E, Vingiani A . Multigene signatures for early breast cancer in clinical practice: A report of the Lombardy genomic assays for breast cancer working group. Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1081885. PMC: 10025563. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1081885. View

2.
Penault-Llorca F, Kwiatkowski F, Arnaud A, Levy C, Leheurteur M, Uwer L . Decision of adjuvant chemotherapy in intermediate risk luminal breast cancer patients: A prospective multicenter trial assessing the clinical and psychological impact of EndoPredict® (EpClin) use (UCBG 2-14). Breast. 2019; 49:132-140. PMC: 7375561. DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2019.10.013. View

3.
Loibl S, Jackisch C, Lederer B, Untch M, Paepke S, Kummel S . Outcome after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in young breast cancer patients: a pooled analysis of individual patient data from eight prospectively randomized controlled trials. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015; 152(2):377-87. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-015-3479-z. View

4.
Kalinsky K, Barlow W, Gralow J, Meric-Bernstam F, Albain K, Hayes D . 21-Gene Assay to Inform Chemotherapy Benefit in Node-Positive Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021; 385(25):2336-2347. PMC: 9096864. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2108873. View

5.
Kwa M, Makris A, Esteva F . Clinical utility of gene-expression signatures in early stage breast cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017; 14(10):595-610. DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.74. View