» Articles » PMID: 38262649

Vaccine Hesitancy Among Physicians: a Qualitative Study with General Practitioners and Paediatricians in Austria and Germany

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Jan 23
PMID 38262649
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This study aims to understand reasons for vaccine hesitancy (VH) among general practioners (GPs) and paediatricians. We aim to analyse how and when the healthcare workers (HCWs) developed vaccine-hesitant views and how they transfer these to patients.

Design And Setting: Semistructured interviews with vaccine-hesitant GPs and paediatricians were conducted in Austria and Germany using an explorative qualitative research design.

Participants: We contacted 41 physicians through letters and emails and 10 agreed to participate, five were male and five female.

Data Collection And Analysis: Ten interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and anonymised. The material was analysed inductively following a grounded theory approach with open coding using the software atlas.ti.

Results: Key themes that were identified were education and career path, understanding of medicine and medical profession, experiences with vaccines, doctor-patient interactions and continuous education activities and the link to VH. GPs and paediatricians' vaccine-hesitant attitudes developed during their medical training and, in particular, during extracurricular training in homeopathy, which most of the participants completed. Most participants work in private practices rather than with contracts with social insurance because they are not satisfied with the health system. Furthermore, they are critical of biomedicine. Most of the interview partners do not consider themselves antivaccination, but are sceptical towards vaccines and especially point out the side effects. Most do not vaccinate in their practices and some do only occasionally. Their vaccine-hesitant views are often fostered through respective online communities of vaccine-hesitant HCWs.

Conclusions: More studies on a connection between complementary medicine and vaccine-hesitant views of HCWs are needed. Education about vaccines and infectious diseases among healthworkers must increase especially tailored towards the use of internet and social media. Physicians should be made aware that through time and empathy towards their patients they could have a positive impact on undecided patients and parents regarding vaccine decisions.

Citing Articles

Validity and Reliability of the Greek Version of Adult Vaccine Hesitancy Scale in Terms of Dispositional Optimism in a Community-Dwelling Population: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Gialama M, Kleisiaris C, Malliarou M, Papagiannis D, Papathanasiou I, Karavasileiadou S Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(15).

PMID: 39120164 PMC: 11311501. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12151460.

References
1.
MacDonald N, Dube E . Unpacking Vaccine Hesitancy Among Healthcare Providers. EBioMedicine. 2015; 2(8):792-3. PMC: 4563149. DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.06.028. View

2.
Solis Arce J, Warren S, Meriggi N, Scacco A, McMurry N, Voors M . COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy in low- and middle-income countries. Nat Med. 2021; 27(8):1385-1394. PMC: 8363502. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-021-01454-y. View

3.
Ledda C, Rapisarda V, Maltezou H . COVID-19 vaccination refusal and suspension of work among healthy healthcare personnel in Italy: A cross-sectional study of their knowledge and attitudes toward vaccinations. Vaccine X. 2023; 13:100275. PMC: 9918318. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2023.100275. View

4.
Nuzhath T, Spiegelman A, Scobee J, Goidel K, Washburn D, Callaghan T . Primary care physicians' strategies for addressing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Soc Sci Med. 2023; 333:116150. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116150. View

5.
Reyes C, Cao W, Astorini A, Drohan M, Schulz C, Shuster C . Using the theory of planned behavior to assess willingness and attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination among a predominantly white U.S. college sample. Health Psychol Behav Med. 2023; 11(1):2248236. PMC: 10438853. DOI: 10.1080/21642850.2023.2248236. View