Size Thresholds for Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Warrant Reconsideration

Overview

Journal J Vasc Surg

Publisher Elsevier

Specialties Cardiology & Vascular Diseases
General Surgery

Date 2024 Jan 23

PMID 38262565

Authors

Jesse A Columbo

Salvatore T Scali

Benjamin N Jacobs

Rebecca E Scully

Bjoern D Suckow

Thomas S Huber

Dan Neal

David H Stone

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The historical size threshold for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair is widely accepted to be 5.5 cm for men and 5.0 cm for women. However, contemporary AAA rupture risks may be lower than historical benchmarks, which has implications for when AAAs should be repaired. Our objective was to use contemporary AAA rupture rates to inform optimal size thresholds for AAA repair.

Methods: We used a Markov chain analysis to estimate life expectancy for patients with AAA. The primary outcome was AAA-related mortality. We estimated survival using Social Security Administration life tables and published contemporary AAA rupture estimates. For those undergoing repair, we modified survival estimates using data from the Vascular Quality Initiative and Medicare on complications, late rupture, and open conversion. We used this model to estimate the AAA repair size threshold that minimizes AAA-related mortality for 60-year-old average-health men and women. We performed a sensitivity analysis of poor-health patients and 70- and 80-year-old base cases.

Results: The annual risk of all-cause mortality under surveillance for a 60-year-old woman presenting with a 5.0 cm AAA using repair thresholds of 5.5 cm, 6.0 cm, 6.5 cm, and 7.0 cm was 1.7%, 2.3%, 2.7%, and 2.8%, respectively. The corresponding risk for a man was 2.3%, 2.9%, 3.3%, and 3.4% for the same repair thresholds, respectively. For a 60-year-old average-health woman, an AAA repair size of 6.1 cm was the optimal threshold to minimize AAA-related mortality. Life expectancy varied by <2 months for repair at sizes from 5.7 cm to 7.1 cm. For a 60-year-old average-health man, an AAA repair size of 6.9 cm was the optimal threshold to minimize AAA-related mortality. Life expectancy varied by <2 months for repair at sizes from 6.0 cm to 7.4 cm. Women in poor health, at various age strata, had optimal AAA repair size thresholds that were >6.5 cm, whereas men in poor health, at all ages, had optimal repair size thresholds that were >8.0 cm.

Conclusions: The optimal threshold for AAA repair is more nuanced than a discrete size. Specifically, there appears to be a range of AAA sizes for which repair is reasonable to minmized AAA-related mortality. Notably, they all are greater than current guideline recommendations. These findings would suggest that contemporary AAA size thresholds for repair should be reconsidered.

References

Ponukumati A, Columbo J, Suckow B, Stableford J, Henkin S, Beach J . The financial implications of cardiac stress testing prior to abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Vasc Med. 2022; 27(5):469-475. DOI: 10.1177/1358863X221112180. View

. Mortality results for randomised controlled trial of early elective surgery or ultrasonographic surveillance for small abdominal aortic aneurysms. The UK Small Aneurysm Trial Participants. Lancet. 1998; 352(9141):1649-55. View

Finlayson S, Birkmeyer J, Fillinger M, Cronenwett J . Should endovascular surgery lower the threshold for repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms?. J Vasc Surg. 1999; 29(6):973-85. DOI: 10.1016/s0741-5214(99)70238-7. View

Rokosh R, Wu W, Eskandari M, Chaikof E . Society for Vascular Surgery implementation of guidelines in abdominal aortic aneurysms: Preoperative surveillance and threshold for repair. J Vasc Surg. 2021; 74(4):1053-1054. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.04.068. View

Trooboff S, Wanken Z, Gladders B, Columbo J, Lurie J, Goodney P . Longitudinal Spending on Endovascular and Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020; 13(5):e006249. PMC: 8842568. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.006249. View

Wanhainen A, Verzini F, Van Herzeele I, Allaire E, Bown M, Cohnert T . Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2019 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-iliac Artery Aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018; 57(1):8-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.09.020. View

Chaikof E, Dalman R, Eskandari M, Jackson B, Lee W, Mansour M . The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2017; 67(1):2-77.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.10.044. View

Gadowski G, PILCHER D, Ricci M . Abdominal aortic aneurysm expansion rate: effect of size and beta-adrenergic blockade. J Vasc Surg. 1994; 19(4):727-31. DOI: 10.1016/s0741-5214(94)70048-6. View

Lederle F, Wilson S, Johnson G, Reinke D, Littooy F, Acher C . Immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346(19):1437-44. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa012573. View

10.

Earnshaw J . The Indication for Elective Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Should Be Reviewed. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020; 61(1):7-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.09.001. View

11.

Schermerhorn M, Buck D, OMalley A, Curran T, McCallum J, Darling J . Long-Term Outcomes of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in the Medicare Population. N Engl J Med. 2015; 373(4):328-38. PMC: 4532303. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1405778. View

12.

Ouriel K, Clair D, Kent K, Zarins C . Endovascular repair compared with surveillance for patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2010; 51(5):1081-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.10.113. View

13.

Suckow B, Schanzer A, Hoel A, Wyers M, Marone L, Veeraswamy R . A national survey of disease-specific knowledge in patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2016; 63(5):1156-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.12.042. View

14.

Columbo J, Martinez-Camblor P, OMalley A, Suckow B, Hoel A, Stone D . Long-term Reintervention After Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair. Ann Surg. 2019; 274(1):179-185. PMC: 10683776. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003446. View

15.

Sweeting M, Thompson S, Brown L, Powell J . Meta-analysis of individual patient data to examine factors affecting growth and rupture of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Br J Surg. 2012; 99(5):655-65. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.8707. View

16.

Cao P, de Rango P, Verzini F, Parlani G, Romano L, Cieri E . Comparison of surveillance versus aortic endografting for small aneurysm repair (CAESAR): results from a randomised trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010; 41(1):13-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.08.026. View

17.

Cronenwett J . Why should I join the Vascular Quality Initiative?. J Vasc Surg. 2020; 71(2):364-373. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.10.011. View

18.

Warner C, Horvath A, Powell R, Columbo J, Walsh T, Goodney P . Endovascular aneurysm repair delivery redesign leads to quality improvement and cost reduction. J Vasc Surg. 2015; 62(2):285-9. PMC: 5292271. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.02.054. View

19.

Brady A, Thompson S, Fowkes F, Greenhalgh R, Powell J . Abdominal aortic aneurysm expansion: risk factors and time intervals for surveillance. Circulation. 2004; 110(1):16-21. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000133279.07468.9F. View

20.

Ilyas S, Stone D, Powell R, Ponukumati A, Kuwayama D, Goodney P . The financial burden associated with endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal and pararenal aortic aneurysms using physician-modified fenestrated-branched endografts. J Vasc Surg. 2023; 78(6):1369-1375. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.06.020. View