» Articles » PMID: 38259367

Developmental Disturbance in Premolars After Intraligamental Anesthesia Using Computer-Controlled Local Anesthesia Delivery System: An-Eight-Years Follow-Up Study in Children

Overview
Journal Cureus
Date 2024 Jan 23
PMID 38259367
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of developmental disturbances in permanent second premolars in which their tooth buds were exposed to mandibular intraligamental anesthesia (ILA) using a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system (CCLAD). Materials and methods This was a longitudinal follow-up study conducted in a previous randomized clinical trial (RCT). In the previous RCT, a total of 91 children were included (61 control and 30 cases). A structured form was created that contained details about the date of birth, age, and sex at which the participants received local anesthesia and the type of local anesthesia administered (ILA using CCLADS, traditional inferior alveolar nerve block [IANB], and IANB using CCLADS). A history of post-treatment abscess, retreatment, and post-treatment extraction was documented in both groups. Descriptive statistics, including frequency and percentage, and additionally, the chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were used to compare ILA and IANB. Results Forty of the 91 children attended follow-up visits. Only two children had developmental defects: one child who received traditional IANB had a demarcated white opacity (this patient had a history of dental abscess), and another who received ILA using CCLADS showed hypoplasia on his permanent premolar. No significant association was found between the type of anesthesia and the presence of developmental defects. Conclusion The slow administration of ILA delivered by CCLADS in the primary teeth does not increase the chances of developmental disturbances or damage to the corresponding permanent tooth bud.

References
1.
Baghlaf K, Elashiry E, Alamoudi N . Computerized intraligamental anesthesia in children: A review of clinical considerations. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2018; 18(4):197-204. PMC: 6115374. DOI: 10.17245/jdapm.2018.18.4.197. View

2.
Caeiro-Villasenin L, Serna-Munoz C, Perez-Silva A, Vicente-Hernandez A, Poza-Pascual A, Ortiz-Ruiz A . Developmental Dental Defects in Permanent Teeth Resulting from Trauma in Primary Dentition: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(2). PMC: 8775964. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19020754. View

3.
Hochman M . Single-tooth anesthesia: pressure-sensing technology provides innovative advancement in the field of dental local anesthesia. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2007; 28(4):186-8, 190, 192-3. View

4.
Ashkenazi M, Blumer S, Eli I . Effect of computerized delivery intraligamental injection in primary molars on their corresponding permanent tooth buds. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2010; 20(4):270-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2010.01049.x. View

5.
Helmy R, Zeitoun S, El-Habashy L . Computer-controlled Intraligamentary local anaesthesia in extraction of mandibular primary molars: randomised controlled clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2022; 22(1):194. PMC: 9121608. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-022-02194-2. View