» Articles » PMID: 38258997

Outcomes of Elective Liver Surgery Worldwide: a Global, Prospective, Multicenter, Cross-sectional Study

Overview
Journal Int J Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2024 Jan 23
PMID 38258997
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The outcomes of liver surgery worldwide remain unknown. The true population-based outcomes are likely different to those vastly reported that reflect the activity of highly specialized academic centers. The aim of this study was to measure the true worldwide practice of liver surgery and associated outcomes by recruiting from centers across the globe. The geographic distribution of liver surgery activity and complexity was also evaluated to further understand variations in outcomes.

Methods: LiverGroup.org was an international, prospective, multicenter, cross-sectional study following the Global Surgery Collaborative Snapshot Research approach with a 3-month prospective, consecutive patient enrollment within January-December 2019. Each patient was followed up for 90 days postoperatively. All patients undergoing liver surgery at their respective centers were eligible for study inclusion. Basic demographics, patient and operation characteristics were collected. Morbidity was recorded according to the Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications. Country-based and hospital-based data were collected, including the Human Development Index (HDI). (NCT03768141).

Results: A total of 2159 patients were included from six continents. Surgery was performed for cancer in 1785 (83%) patients. Of all patients, 912 (42%) experienced a postoperative complication of any severity, while the major complication rate was 16% (341/2159). The overall 90-day mortality rate after liver surgery was 3.8% (82/2,159). The overall failure to rescue rate was 11% (82/ 722) ranging from 5 to 35% among the higher and lower HDI groups, respectively.

Conclusions: This is the first to our knowledge global surgery study specifically designed and conducted for specialized liver surgery. The authors identified failure to rescue as a significant potentially modifiable factor for mortality after liver surgery, mostly related to lower Human Development Index countries. Members of the LiverGroup.org network could now work together to develop quality improvement collaboratives.

Citing Articles

Evidence map of liver surgery: study protocol of a living systematic review.

Heersche S, Giron H, Uldry E, Joliat G, Huttner F, Probst P BMJ Open. 2025; 15(2):e086096.

PMID: 40000081 PMC: 11865728. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086096.


The effect of perioperative probiotics and synbiotics on postoperative infections in patients undergoing major liver surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Wu H, Guan Z, Zhang K, Zhou L, Cao L, Mou X PeerJ. 2025; 13:e18874.

PMID: 39981042 PMC: 11841616. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18874.


Evolution of Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Change Point Analysis of Textbook Outcome over Twenty Years.

Park Y, Han H, Lim S, Joo H, Kim J, Kang M Medicina (Kaunas). 2025; 61(1.

PMID: 39858994 PMC: 11766512. DOI: 10.3390/medicina61010012.


Predictors for 30-day mortality in hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing liver resection.

Prabowo E, Susilaningsih N, Suharti C, Purnomo H, Riwanto I, Fuadi A Narra J. 2025; 4(3):e1001.

PMID: 39816077 PMC: 11731945. DOI: 10.52225/narra.v4i3.1001.


Impact of Positive Lymph Nodes after Systematic Perihilar Lymphadenectomy in Colorectal Liver Metastases.

Hess G, Aegerter N, Zeindler J, Vosbeck J, Neuschutz K, Muller P J Clin Med. 2024; 13(17).

PMID: 39274514 PMC: 11395892. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13175301.


References
1.
Wigmore S . Advances in liver surgery. Br J Surg. 2020; 107(7):788-789. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11624. View

2.
Lee A, Purshouse K . COVID-19 and cancer registries: learning from the first peak of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Br J Cancer. 2021; 124(11):1777-1784. PMC: 7992513. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-021-01324-x. View

3.
Ardito F, Famularo S, Aldrighetti L, Grazi G, DallaValle R, Maestri M . The Impact of Hospital Volume on Failure to Rescue after Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Analysis from the HE.RC.O.LE.S. Italian Registry. Ann Surg. 2020; 272(5):840-846. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004327. View

4.
Healy M, Mullard A, Campbell Jr D, Dimick J . Hospital and Payer Costs Associated With Surgical Complications. JAMA Surg. 2016; 151(9):823-30. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.0773. View

5.
Portuondo J, Shah S, Singh H, Massarweh N . Failure to Rescue as a Surgical Quality Indicator: Current Concepts and Future Directions for Improving Surgical Outcomes. Anesthesiology. 2019; 131(2):426-437. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002602. View